Opt-in Ad Targeting via User Data Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current online advertising systems struggle to effectively target specific consumer groups, leading to low return on investment for advertisers, as they often display ads to all website visitors regardless of demographic fit, and charge a flat fee based on website popularity rather than user data quality.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that present customized opt-in windows to users by collecting and validating user information against advertiser-defined criteria, displaying relevant ads only to matching users, and billing advertisers based on objective success metrics such as user engagement and data quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If ads are displayed to all website visitors, then ad coverage is maximized, but ad relevance to specific consumer groups deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvead coverageVSAvoidad relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the audience by collecting demographic and behavioral data from users, then divides ad delivery into targeted groups based on predefined criteria. Instead of showing all ads to everyone, the system segments users and matches specific ads to specific segments, thereby maintaining high coverage while improving relevance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by tailoring ad content to specific user groups based on their characteristics. Different portions of the advertising system serve different functions for different user segments - generic ads for broad audiences, targeted ads for specific demographics - thereby optimizing relevance locally for each group while maintaining overall system coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If a flat fee is charged based on website popularity, then billing simplicity is maintained, but billing accuracy reflecting user data quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebilling simplicityVSAvoidbilling accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the billing parameter from a simple flat fee based on website traffic to a multi-factor pricing model that incorporates user data quality metrics, opt-in rates, and demographic matching accuracy. This allows billing to reflect the actual value provided to advertisers while maintaining a structured calculation framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where billing rates are adjusted based on performance data. Advertisers pay based on actual results such as opt-in conversions and demographic matching success, creating a feedback loop where billing accuracy improves over time based on measured outcomes rather than relying solely on preliminary website popularity metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If user information is collected and validated against multiple sources, then user data quality is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser data qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing validation rules and criteria before user data collection. Multiple data sources and validation algorithms are pre-configured and tested, so that when user information is collected, the validation process automatically executes according to predetermined parameters. This reduces operational complexity during actual data processing while maintaining high data quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If opt-in windows are customized based on user matching, then ad effectiveness is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvead effectivenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses preliminary action by pre-segmenting users into demographic groups and pre-matching ads to these segments before the opt-in window is displayed. User data is collected and categorized in advance, and relevant ads are pre-selected based on matching algorithms. When the opt-in window appears, the customization process is already largely complete, significantly reducing display processing time while maintaining high ad effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9779408B2Privacy conscious qualification of opt-in advertiser opportunities
Publication Date: 2017.10.03 OPT INTELLIGENCE
  • US9779408B2 patent drawing
  • US9779408B2 patent drawing
  • US9779408B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a system and method for flexibly offering on-line promotions to visitors of a website hosted by a server, when a user signs up with the website, the server collects a plurality of user data from the visitor. If a user's data matches predetermined criteria from an advertiser, then online promotions from this advertiser are included in an opt-in window displayed to the user. In some aspects, a bifurcated client/server scripting approach isolates personally identifiable information until or unless a user opts-into an offer or offers. The server dynamically generates pricing information for each advertiser according to a flexible algorithm. The flexible algorithm depends on the type and quality of user requested by the advertiser.