Optical 3D Printing Parameter Switching for Speed and Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 3D printing technologies face limitations in achieving both speed and resolution, particularly in optical 3D printing, with issues such as overprinting and over-curing affecting the quality of printed objects.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using multiple parameter sets and light beams with distinct optical properties to print different portions of a 3D object, allowing for varying feature sizes and curing levels to optimize printing speed and resolution, with the potential use of a single light source for both beams.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single parameter set is used for printing the entire 3D object, then the printing process is simpler and faster, but the resolution and quality of different portions of the object deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting speedVSAvoidresolution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The 3D object is divided into multiple portions (first portion, second portion, third portion) with different feature sizes. Each portion is assigned a specific parameter set optimized for its characteristics: first parameter set for large features, second parameter set for small features, and third parameter set for intermediate features. This segmentation allows simultaneous optimization of printing speed for large portions and resolution for detailed portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parameter sets are applied to different portions of the 3D object based on local requirements. The first parameter set (higher optical power, longer illumination time) is used for portions requiring faster printing, while the second parameter set (lower optical power, shorter illumination time) is used for portions requiring higher resolution. This local quality approach ensures each region receives optimal printing parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If higher optical power and longer illumination time are used, then printing speed improves, but overprinting and over-curing occur reducing quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting speedVSAvoidquality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically varies key printing parameters including optical power, illumination time, voxel count, and dwell time across different parameter sets. The first parameter set uses higher optical power and longer illumination time for speed, while the second parameter set uses lower optical power and shorter illumination time to prevent over-curing. This controlled parameter changes approach maintains quality consistency while optimizing speed where possible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies appropriate levels of optical power and illumination time to different portions rather than using maximum settings throughout. For portions with large features, higher power and longer time are acceptable (partial action), while for portions with small features, reduced power and time prevent excessive curing. This selective application of action levels maintains overall quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple parameter sets with different optical properties are used for different portions, then printing quality and resolution are improved, but the device complexity and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveresolutionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single light source is configured to generate multiple light beams with different optical properties (different optical powers, wavelengths, or beam profiles). This multi-functional light source eliminates the need for multiple separate light sources, reducing device complexity while still enabling different parameter sets to be applied to different portions of the 3D object for optimized resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple parameter sets and their associated light beams into a unified printing process controlled by a single system. The computer-readable instructions coordinate the application of different parameter sets to different portions, merging what would otherwise be separate printing operations into one integrated process, thereby managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If different parameter sets are applied to different portions, then over-curing is reduced, but the printing process time increases due to multiple parameter transitions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovequalityVSAvoidprinting process time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The printing process continuously applies appropriate parameter sets to different portions of the 3D object without stopping or resetting between portions. The system maintains continuous printing action by seamlessly transitioning between parameter sets based on the current portion being printed, eliminating idle time and keeping the useful printing action ongoing throughout the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The printing path is pre-planned and pre-assigned with the appropriate parameter sets before printing begins. The system knows in advance which parameter set to apply to each portion, allowing for smooth transitions and eliminating decision-making delays during printing. This preliminary configuration optimizes the sequence to minimize parameter transition overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces overprinting and over-curing, enhancing the overall quality and consistency of 3D printed objects by optimizing printing parameters for each portion, thereby improving the efficiency and fidelity of the printing process.

Implementation Method 1

directing a light beam to the composition to form a three-dimensional object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerisation: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS20250353252A1Methods and systems for three-dimensional printing
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 PRELLIS BIOLOGICS INC
  • US20250353252A1 patent drawing
  • US20250353252A1 patent drawing
  • US20250353252A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are methods and systems for improving performance of three-dimensional printing systems, which may include: printing a first portion of the 3D object using a first parameter set and a first light beam, wherein the first parameter set includes at least one first parameter corresponding to a first optical property of the first light beam; and printing a second portion of the 3D In object different from the first portion using a second parameter set and a second light beam, wherein the second parameter set includes at least one second parameter corresponding to a second optical property of the second light beam, wherein the second parameter set is different from the first parameter set, wherein the second optical property is different from the first optical property, to yield at least at least a portion of the 3D object comprising the first portion and the second portion.