Optical Amplifier Noise Figure Calculation for Partial-Fill Scenarios

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current models for noise figure and gain in optical amplifiers, such as EDFAs, are inadequate for partial-fill scenarios as they ignore channel loading, leading to substantial errors in link budget and system control, especially due to spectral hole burning effects.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that calculate the noise figure and gain correction for optical amplifiers in partial-fill scenarios by using an effective number of channels and accounting for channel loading, incorporating noise figure correction values and spectral hole burning effects to adjust the noise figure and gain accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If current noise figure and gain models are used for optical amplifiers, then calculation simplicity is maintained, but measurement precision deteriorates due to ignoring channel loading in partial-fill scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise figure calculation accuracyVSAvoidcalculation model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces channel loading as a variable parameter that modifies the noise figure calculation. The noise figure is adjusted based on the number of active wavelength channels relative to the total capacity, transforming the fixed noise figure model into a dynamic one that adapts to partial-fill scenarios. This resolves the contradiction by making the calculation accurate without requiring a completely new complex model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by considering only the relevant portion of channel loading that affects noise figure in partial-fill scenarios. Instead of modeling all possible interactions between channels, it focuses on the effective number of channels that actually contribute to spectral hole burning effects, simplifying the calculation while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If channel loading is ignored in noise figure calculations, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability deteriorates due to substantial errors in link budget and system control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelink budget accuracyVSAvoidcalculation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the noise figure parameter to account for channel loading effects. By introducing a channel loading factor based on the ratio of active channels to total channels, the noise figure dynamically adjusts to reflect actual operating conditions. This ensures reliable link budget calculations while maintaining operational simplicity through a straightforward parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If spectral hole burning effects are not accounted for, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision worsens due to errors in gain and noise figure calculations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegain calculation accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates spectral hole burning effects by adjusting the gain and noise figure parameters based on channel loading conditions. The model uses the effective number of channels to modify these parameters, capturing the spectral hole burning phenomenon without requiring complex physical modeling. This achieves measurement precision while controlling device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides accurate noise figure and gain calculations for optical amplifiers in partial-fill scenarios, reducing errors and improving system control and design by accounting for channel loading and spectral hole burning effects, thereby enhancing the performance of optical communications systems.

Implementation Method 1

Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifiers (EDFAs) are one type of optical amplifiers that are commonly used in optical systems

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectErbium Doped Fiber Amplification:

Implementation Method 2

EDFAs may also contribute noise in the optical signals, which needs to be accounted for

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpontaneous Emission:

Implementation Method 3

Current models for noise figure and gain in optical amplifiers, such as EDFAs, are inadequate for partial-fill scenarios as they ignore channel loading, leading to substantial errors in link budget and system control, especially due to spectral hole burning effects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpectral Hole Burning:

Data Source

PatentUS9503188B2Apparatus and method to calculate a noise figure of an optical amplifier for wavelength channels in a partial-fill scenario to account for channel loading
Publication Date: 2016.11.22 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US9503188B2 patent drawing
  • US9503188B2 patent drawing
  • US9503188B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus comprising a processor configured to calculate a noise figure of an optical amplifier for a plurality of selected wavelength channels in a partial-fill scenario that accounts for channel loading. The noise figure is calculated using a plurality of corresponding noise figure correction values at a plurality of wavelengths based on an effective number of channels.