Optical Axis Photoelectric Sensor for False Obstruction Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional multiple optical axis photoelectric sensors fail to distinguish between light obstruction caused by the intended object and other factors, leading to frequent machine stoppages due to false detections, which impairs productivity while compromising safety.

Innovation Solution

The sensor employs malfunction notification and variable update mechanisms to differentiate between light obstruction caused by the detection target and other factors by setting reference values for light entrance and obstruction durations, enabling accurate analysis and notification of malfunctions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If response speed is enhanced to reliably stop machine when human body enters dangerous region, then safety is improved, but light obstruction may be detected even for short period causing frequent machine stoppages

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidmachine stoppage frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor performs preliminary validation of optical axes and pre-processes light reception signals before making obstruction determinations. By validating optical axes in advance and performing multiple light emission/detection cycles, the system prepares detection data beforehand, enabling rapid response to actual obstructions while filtering out transient false signals through pre-established baseline information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors light reception signals and compares them against reference values and historical data. When light obstruction is detected, the control signal switches to off-state, and the system continues to monitor subsequent signals to confirm whether the obstruction persists. This feedback mechanism allows the sensor to distinguish between temporary disturbances (like insects) and genuine safety threats, reducing false stoppages while maintaining rapid response capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If light obstruction detection sensitivity is increased to detect all obstructions, then detection precision is improved, but false detection from insects or optical axis deviation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight obstruction detection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse detection rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts detection parameters including light emission timing, reception threshold levels, and determination criteria based on validated optical axis characteristics. By changing these parameters adaptively, the sensor achieves high sensitivity for genuine obstructions while setting thresholds that filter out minor variations caused by insects or slight optical misalignments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor performs multiple light emissions and detections beyond the minimum single measurement. By conducting excessive detection cycles (multiple times the theoretical minimum), the system accumulates sufficient data to distinguish true obstructions from noise, using the redundancy of multiple measurements to improve reliability without sacrificing detection sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If multiple light emissions and detections are performed to reduce false determination, then reliability is improved, but response time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse determination reductionVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs light emissions and detections in continuous sequence without idle intervals between cycles. Optical axes are validated continuously, and light reception signals are monitored without interruption. This continuous operation allows multiple measurements to be taken in rapid succession, accumulating reliable detection data while minimizing total response time compared to batch processing approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

Optical axis validation and initial light reception measurements are performed in advance before actual obstruction detection is needed. By establishing baseline information about valid optical paths and expected signal characteristics beforehand, the system reduces the processing time required during actual detection events, enabling rapid response while maintaining the benefit of multiple pre-collected measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for precise differentiation between valid and invalid light obstruction states, reducing false stoppages and enhancing sensor performance by accurately identifying and addressing the cause of malfunctions.

Implementation Method 1

a light emitting element 10 and a light receiving element 20 are disposed opposite to each other... the optical axes are sequentially validated, optical scan processing is repeatedly performed to detect the existence or non-existence of light at the entrance of the validated optical axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight emission and detection: Light

Data Source

PatentUS8786436B2Multiple optical axis photoelectric sensor
Publication Date: 2014.07.22 OMRON CORP
  • US8786436B2 patent drawing
  • US8786436B2 patent drawing
  • US8786436B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multiple optical axis photoelectric sensor is provided that stops a control output according to light being obstructed in a detection area. First and second variable signals indicate the duration of an optical axis scan processing for which light entrance detection and light obstruction detection are obtained, respectively. The first and second variable signals are updated according to results of each scan in the optical axis scan processing. When the value of the first variable reaches a predetermined first reference value, and when a final value of the second variable is equal to or lower than a predetermined second reference value, a notification is made that the light obstruction is detected due to a malfunction. As a result of this notification, whether output signal of the sensor is erroneously switched due to a cause other than an object of a detection target can correctly be made.