Optical Bypass Node Upgrade Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current optical networks face challenges in efficiently managing capacity growth and changes without disrupting service, as they often require costly upgrades and may result in either insufficient capacity or excess capacity due to unpredictable future needs, and existing upgrade methods necessitate network shutdowns, which is costly in industries like telecommunications.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of optical bypass capabilities in existing networks, allowing for modular upgrades and flexible capacity management through the use of drop and add taps, bypass devices, and blocking filters, enabling upgrades without service disruptions by maintaining optical signal flow and dynamically managing power distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If optical bypass capabilities are implemented through modular upgrades, then network adaptability and flexibility are improved, but device complexity increases due to additional components like drop taps, add taps, and bypass devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork adaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optical network is segmented into modular components including drop taps, add taps, and bypass devices that can be independently configured and upgraded. This segmentation allows the network to implement optical bypass capabilities at specific nodes without replacing the entire network infrastructure, thereby improving adaptability while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The drop taps and add taps are designed with multi-functionality to serve both as optical bypass components and as part of the existing WDM network infrastructure. These universal components can handle multiple functions including wavelength division multiplexing, optical bypass routing, and network protection, reducing the need for separate dedicated components and thus managing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the entire network is replaced to meet future needs, then long-term capacity requirements are satisfied, but short-term financial costs increase and service disruption occurs during upgrade

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelong-term capacityVSAvoidservice disruption time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The network is pre-configured with drop taps and add taps at OEO nodes during the initial deployment phase, enabling future optical bypass capabilities to be activated without physical network replacement. This preliminary action allows the network to prepare infrastructure for future needs while maintaining current service operations, avoiding service disruption during upgrades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The network configuration is made dynamic through the ability to activate or deactivate optical bypass paths at different nodes based on current traffic demands and future projections. This dynamic reconfiguration allows the network to adapt to changing capacity requirements without physical replacement, satisfying long-term needs while avoiding service disruption through software-based control rather than hardware replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If optical signals undergo OEO conversion at all nodes, then network reliability is maintained through regeneration, but capacity efficiency decreases and express traffic must be routed through unnecessary conversion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal regenerationVSAvoidcapacity efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the OEO conversion function from all nodes and applies it selectively only at nodes where regeneration is actually needed. By using optical bypass paths, express traffic can skip intermediate nodes that would otherwise perform unnecessary OEO conversion, thereby improving capacity efficiency while maintaining reliability through targeted regeneration only where required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of performing complete OEO conversion at every node along the entire path, the system applies partial action by enabling optical bypass for express traffic that does not require regeneration. This partial application of OEO conversion only at necessary nodes improves capacity efficiency by eliminating redundant conversions while maintaining sufficient reliability through regeneration at strategic locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7356259B1Optical bypass upgrade configuration
Publication Date: 2008.04.08 CIENA CORP
  • US7356259B1 patent drawing
  • US7356259B1 patent drawing
  • US7356259B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Optical bypass node upgrade configurations are disclosed: (1) a configuration where optical taps are pre-positioned in wavelength division multiplex (WDM) line systems terminating at optical-electrical-optical (OEO) core switching nodes to allow for future upgrade of the nodes to degree-two or higher optical bypass; (2) a configuration where the taps are pre-positioned in a degree-two optical bypass node to allow for future upgrade to a degree-N optical bypass node; and (3) a configuration and procedure for upgrading OEO core switching nodes to optical bypass when the taps have not been pre-positioned in the WDM line systems. These configurations do not introduce bit errors for non-upgraded optical paths.