Optical Cable Stripping Tool Guided Blade Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tools for cutting access windows in optical cables are hazardous due to exposed blades, lack precision, and often result in incomplete or uneven cuts, posing risks to operators and the environment.

Innovation Solution

A stripping tool with a blade block and guiding elements within a casing, where the blade is hidden and moved via an external actuating device, ensuring controlled and reproducible cuts through predefined guiding slots, minimizing operator risk and ensuring accurate access window creation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a separate blade is used to cut the access window, then the cutting operation can be performed, but the operator may accidentally injure himself with the blade

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting operationVSAvoidoperator injury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is extracted from direct operator contact by being housed within a protective casing. The actuating device is separated from the blade, with the actuator operating from outside the casing while the blade remains enclosed, thus removing the harmful factor of direct blade exposure while preserving cutting functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The casing acts as an intermediary between the operator and the blade. The actuating device serves as a mediator that transmits cutting motion to the blade without requiring the operator to directly handle or expose the blade, thereby eliminating injury risk while maintaining operational capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the operator exerts pressure to cut the access window, then the cutting can be made, but the depth and size of the cut depend on operator pressure which can be excessive or insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting operationVSAvoidcut depth and size consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-regulation of cutting depth and pressure through its mechanical design. The guided movement mechanism automatically controls the blade's penetration depth, and the casing structure provides inherent pressure regulation, eliminating dependence on operator skill or force application while ensuring consistent, precise cuts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting parameters (depth, pressure, speed) are changed from operator-controlled variables to system-controlled constants. The mechanical guidance system fixes the blade trajectory and depth, while the actuating mechanism regulates pressure, transforming the cutting process from skill-dependent to parameter-controlled for consistent precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the cable is held steady during cutting, then the cutting can be performed, but the axial traction force applied to open the access window causes the cable to move

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting operationVSAvoidcable position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The tool is segmented into distinct functional zones: a clamping section that secures the cable in place, and a cutting section that performs the window opening. This segmentation allows the clamping mechanism to provide stable cable fixation while the cutting mechanism operates independently, preventing cable movement during the cutting action

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tool employs dynamic adaptation through its mechanical design that adjusts to cable diameter variations. The actuating device incorporates movement compensation that adapts to different cable sizes and positions, maintaining stable cable engagement while enabling the cutting operation without causing cable displacement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If multiple cuts are made to remove the sheath, then the access window can be created, but multiple small chips are produced which remain in the cable or are left on the site

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesheath removalVSAvoidenvironmental impact from chips
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting action is made continuous rather than intermittent. The blade moves in a single continuous motion through the sheath material, creating one clean cut that removes the entire required portion in one pass. This eliminates the multiple cutting steps that generate numerous small chips, reducing environmental contamination while maintaining effective sheath removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP2577370B1Stripping tool for optical cable
Publication Date: 2014.11.26 PRYSMIAN SPA
  • EP2577370B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2577370B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2577370B1 patent drawingFigure 4a~4b

AI summary

It is disclosed a stripping tool for cutting an access window in an optical cable. The tool comprises: a blade block comprising a blade; a casing provided with at least one guiding element, wherein the blade block is movable within the casing; and an actuating device, operable from outside the casing, configured to impart to the blade block a movement along a cutting path defined by the guiding element so that a portion of the sheath of the optical cable is cut in a controlled manner.