Optical Image Contrast Metrics for Wafer Defect Target Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As semiconductor manufacturing processes approach design rule limits, the detection of smaller defects becomes crucial for maintaining yield and electrical parameter integrity, but existing inspection systems struggle to differentiate between yield-relevant and nuisance defects, leading to increased complexity and cost in process corrections.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing a light source, detector, and processor to generate an optical image, determine a gradient magnitude image, and calculate an image contrast metric by combining the contrast of specific pixel sets from the gradient magnitude and context range images, applying confidence levels to prioritize defect detection and alignment performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If inspection sensitivity is increased to detect smaller defects, then defect detection capability is improved, but the number of nuisance defects detected increases dramatically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection sensitivityVSAvoidnumber of detected defects
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of image contrast metric calculation by using gradient magnitude images and context range images with selective pixel sampling (less than 100% of pixels). This transforms the inspection approach to differentiate yield-relevant defects from nuisance defects through modified contrast metrics, resolving the contradiction between detection sensitivity and nuisance defect volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by selecting specific pixels from gradient magnitude and context range images rather than processing all pixels uniformly. This selective sampling approach allows the system to focus computational resources on pixels most relevant to yield-affecting defects while filtering out nuisance defects, thus improving signal-to-noise ratio in defect detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If all detected defects are corrected to eliminate defects, then yield is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase dramatically

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveyieldVSAvoidprocess correction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the yield-relevant defects from the total defect population by using enhanced image contrast metrics and confidence level analysis. Instead of treating all detected defects equally, the system identifies and isolates the subset of defects that actually impact electrical parameters and yield, allowing focused process corrections on critical defects only

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite assessment by combining multiple image processing components (gradient magnitude image, context range image, selective pixel sampling, confidence levels) to generate a composite defect priority metric. This composite approach enables differentiation between yield-critical and non-critical defects, reducing unnecessary process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Measurement precision

If image processing is performed on all pixels, then measurement completeness is improved, but processing time and computational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage analysis completenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by processing less than 100% of pixels in the image - specifically selecting pixels from gradient magnitude and context range images based on confidence levels. This selective pixel processing maintains sufficient measurement completeness for yield-relevant defect detection while significantly reducing computational load and processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the sensitivity of defect detection, improves alignment quality, and reduces the complexity of identifying yield-relevant defects, thereby optimizing process control and reducing costs by focusing on systematic, electrically-relevant defects.

Implementation Method 1

a light source that generates a light beam; a stage configured to hold a wafer in a path of the light beam; a detector configured to receive the light beam reflected from the wafer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS11803960B2Optical image contrast metric for optical target search
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 KLA CORP
  • US11803960B2 patent drawing
  • US11803960B2 patent drawing
  • US11803960B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Global and local alignment energies are used in an image contrast metric. The image contrast metric can be used to find optical targets. Some pixels from a gradient magnitude image and a context range image from an optical image can be used to determine the image contrast metric. A heatmap from the image contrast metrics across part of a wafer can then be used to make a list of targets. Upper and lower confidence values can be applied to rank the available targets.