Optical Device Ring Waveguide Asymmetric Coupling Loss Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optical devices such as ring resonators and ring modulators face challenges in minimizing losses, particularly due to gap variations between waveguides affecting coupling loss and process sensitivity, and smaller circumference increasing bending loss, which impact modulation efficiency and extinction ratio.

Innovation Solution

The optical device design incorporates a ring waveguide with a taper-shaped coupler and an arc-shaped gap between the ring and bus waveguides, allowing for adjustable coupling ratios and reduced bending loss, along with a coupling material to enhance coupling strength and quality factor, and varying radii and widths to control interference conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the gap between waveguides is reduced to improve coupling loss, then coupling loss decreases, but process sensitivity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoupling lossVSAvoidprocess sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric waveguide width design where the first waveguide has a different width than the second waveguide. This asymmetry allows optimization of the coupling gap independently for each waveguide, enabling reduced coupling loss while maintaining manufacturing tolerance. The asymmetric structure creates different mode profiles that enhance coupling efficiency without requiring extremely tight gap control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by varying the width of waveguides at different locations. Specifically, the waveguide width is adjusted in the coupling region compared to other regions, allowing optimal coupling performance at the interface while maintaining standard dimensions elsewhere. This localized optimization reduces the sensitivity to overall manufacturing variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Volume of moving object

If the circumference of the ring resonator is reduced to improve device compactness, then device size decreases, but bending loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidbending loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by varying the waveguide width along the ring resonator circumference. The waveguide width is increased in bending regions to reduce bending loss, while maintaining smaller overall device dimensions through optimized coupling regions. This localized dimension adjustment allows compact design without sacrificing performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses dynamically adjusted waveguide dimensions where the width varies continuously or in steps around the ring resonator. This dynamic geometry optimization allows the resonator to maintain small size while compensating for bending losses through wider sections at critical locations, achieving both compactness and low loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If the waveguide dimension is optimized to improve modulation efficiency, then modulation efficiency increases, but manufacturing tolerance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodulation efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric waveguide dimensions where the first and second waveguides have different widths. This asymmetry is designed to achieve optimal evanescent field overlap for high modulation efficiency while being robust to manufacturing variations. The asymmetric design creates a coupling mechanism that is less sensitive to dimensional tolerances compared to symmetric designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by optimizing specific waveguide width ratios and gap dimensions to achieve high modulation efficiency. The design selects specific dimensional parameters that maximize the modulation effect while being tolerant to typical manufacturing variations, effectively decoupling performance optimization from tight tolerance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design achieves high manufacturing tolerance, reduced coupling losses, improved quality factors, and enhanced modulation efficiency by optimizing the coupling structure and waveguide geometry, thereby addressing the limitations of existing devices.

Implementation Method 1

a gap between waveguides determines coupling loss, coupling ratio

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvanescent field coupling: Total Internal Reflection

Implementation Method 2

ring resonators and ring modulators

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical resonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS11977249B2Optical device
Publication Date: 2024.05.07 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US11977249B2 patent drawing
  • US11977249B2 patent drawing
  • US11977249B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optical device is provided. The optical device includes a ring waveguide and a bus waveguide. The ring waveguide includes a coupling region. The bus waveguide is disposed adjacent to and spaced apart from the coupling region of the ring waveguide. The bus waveguide includes a coupling structure corresponding to the coupling region.