Optical Disc Copying Bypassing Signature Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for copying optical discs are hindered by copy protection techniques that prevent accurate duplication, such as signature methods and data alteration, which deny access to the disc or degrade the copy quality.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for copying optical discs by reading data from levels other than the user data level, such as the error corrected or encoded data level, and writing it back with generated error correction codes or additional codes, thereby bypassing copy protection mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If signature methods of copy protection are used, then access control is improved, but copying capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess controlVSAvoidcopying capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data reading process into multiple levels (user data level, error correction level, encoded level) and selectively reads from lower levels that bypass signature verification, allowing copying while maintaining access control for legitimate users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses error correction codes as an intermediary mechanism to bypass signature protection. By reading and copying data at the error correction level or encoded level, the system can create copies that include the necessary authentication data without triggering the signature verification block

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If data alteration copy protection is applied, then copy quality is improved, but copying operation becomes blocked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecopy qualityVSAvoidcopying operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of preventing copying by altering user data, the patent inverts the approach by reading from lower data levels (error correction level or encoded level) where the alteration doesn't affect functionality, thereby enabling copying operations to proceed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the reading parameter from user data level to error correction level or encoded level, which fundamentally alters which data is copied while maintaining copy quality and enabling the copying operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If error correction codes are discarded during reading, then copying is simplified, but authentication capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecopying processVSAvoidauthentication capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary reading of error correction codes at the error correction level or encoded level before the copying process, preserving authentication capability while maintaining a simplified copying process that doesn't require complex signature verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7747924B2Method and apparatus for copying copy protected optical discs
Publication Date: 2010.06.29 ROVI EURO LTD
  • US7747924B2 patent drawing
  • US7747924B2 patent drawing
  • US7747924B2 patent drawing

AI summary

To copy a copy protected DVD (32), and thereby subvert the copy prot-ection technique, a DVD drive (50) is controlled by a disc copying program (54) to access data at a level other than that at the user data level. For example, if it is the data frame (44) which is read, the DVD drive (50) is controlled to write a data frame (12) to a copy disc (52). During the copying process, the program (54) may be arranged to remove sector IDs and error detection codes from the read data frames (44) and to generate new sector IDs and appropriate ID error detection codes for the data frames (12) to be written to the copy disc (52). This circumvents any copy protection which has been incorporated in the identification data in a data frame of the original disc (52).