Optical Disc Signal Equalization via Run Length Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional optical disc drive systems require a trial-and-error method to adjust low-pass filter and equalizer parameters for optimal jitter performance, which is inefficient due to variance in optical discs and read channels, necessitating a more precise approach to adjust equalizing parameters.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that monitor run lengths of optical disc signals, classify and calculate average values, and adjust equalizing parameters to match expected values, reducing error values within predetermined ranges, thereby optimizing signal equalization without relying on trial and error.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If trial-and-error method is used to adjust equalizer parameters, then the system can be operated, but the adjustment efficiency is low and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter adjustment efficiencyVSAvoidtime for parameter adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated feedback control system where the run length meter continuously monitors signal run lengths and feeds this information back to the processor. The processor automatically adjusts equalizer parameters based on the feedback from run length measurements, eliminating the need for manual trial-and-error adjustment and significantly improving adjustment efficiency while reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment of equalizer parameters through the automated control mechanism. The processor autonomously modifies parameters based on run length measurements without requiring external manual intervention, enabling the system to optimize itself automatically and improving productivity while minimizing time expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual parameter adjustment is used, then the system can adapt to different discs, but the precision of parameter optimization is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimization precisionVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The automated feedback mechanism enables precise parameter optimization by continuously measuring run lengths and automatically adjusting parameters to achieve optimal values. The system compares measured run lengths with target values and makes precise adjustments accordingly, achieving high measurement precision while the automation reduces operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with an automated electronic control system. The processor automatically adjusts parameters based on run length measurements, substituting manual operation with electronic automation. This improves optimization precision while reducing the complexity of manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If fixed equalizer parameters are used, then the system is simple to operate, but the system cannot adapt to variations in optical discs and read channels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different optical discsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic parameter adjustment where equalizer parameters are not fixed but automatically adapted based on run length measurements from different optical discs and read channels. The system dynamically modifies parameters to optimize performance for each specific disc, achieving high adaptability while the automation manages the complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes equalizer parameters based on measured run lengths to adapt to different optical discs and read channel variations. By automatically adjusting parameters such as equalizer coefficients and filter settings based on run length feedback, the system achieves versatility across different media while managing complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If conventional table lookup method is used for parameter selection, then the adjustment process is simplified, but the jitter performance cannot be optimized for all disc types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejitter performanceVSAvoidparameter adjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated feedback control system continuously monitors run lengths and adjusts parameters to optimize jitter performance for each specific disc type. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable jitter performance across all disc types by adapting parameters based on actual measurements rather than relying on pre-defined tables, while the automation manages the complexity of the adjustment mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7436752B2Method and apparatus for signal equalization in a light storage system
Publication Date: 2008.10.14 REALTEK SEMICON CORP
  • US7436752B2 patent drawing
  • US7436752B2 patent drawing
  • US7436752B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for signal equalization in a light storage system is disclosed. The method includes observing run length of an RF signal read from the optical disc; classifying run lengths into sets; calculating the mean of certain run lengths; comparing the values with expected values of said run lengths to generate an error value; and adjusting equalizing parameters of boost and frequency if the error value lies outside an expected range.