Optical Examination Device Using Non-Parallel Light Rays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current optical examination methods face challenges in accurately detecting internal information of test objects, such as living bodies, due to difficulties in selecting the appropriate optical model and errors caused by contact failures and hair interference, which affect the precision of light quantity distribution and cerebral blood flow measurement.

Innovation Solution

The method employs an optical sensor with a light source module that emits multiple non-parallel light rays to an identical point on the test object and a detection system that separates and detects these rays, allowing for the selection of an optimal optical model based on simulated and actual light quantity distributions, and uses a Monte Carlo simulation to correct for errors and improve resolution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single light ray is used for optical examination, then the device structure is simple, but the measurement precision is insufficient due to inability to correct contact failures and hair interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight quantity distribution precisionVSAvoidoptical sensor structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides a single light irradiation into multiple non-parallel light rays (first, second, third light rays) that all pass through the same point on the object. This segmentation allows the system to capture multiple light quantity values from different angles, enabling correction of errors caused by contact failures and hair interference, thereby improving measurement precision without requiring multiple separate light sources positioned at different locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces angular diversity by emitting multiple light rays in different directions (non-parallel rays) that converge at the same point on the object. This adds a dimensional aspect (angular variation) to the optical examination, allowing the detection system to gather information from multiple paths and select or combine the most reliable measurements, thus improving precision while maintaining a relatively simple device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple optical models are used for simulation, then the adaptability to different test objects is improved, but the difficulty of selecting the appropriate model increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical model applicabilityVSAvoidmodel selection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated model selection mechanism that uses the actually measured light quantity distribution as feedback to evaluate and select the most appropriate optical model from multiple candidate models. The system compares simulated light quantity distributions (obtained through Monte Carlo simulation for each optical model) with the actual measurement, and automatically selects the model that best matches the observed data, thereby maintaining high adaptability while eliminating manual model selection difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically selecting the appropriate optical model based on the measured data without requiring user intervention. The model selection process is embedded in the examination workflow, where the system autonomously evaluates multiple optical models against the actual light quantity distribution and chooses the most suitable one, thus maintaining versatility while reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If contact failures and hair interference are not corrected, then the measurement process is simple, but the reliability of cerebral blood flow measurement is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecerebral blood flow measurement reliabilityVSAvoiderror correction process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary error correction by obtaining multiple light quantity values from multiple non-parallel light rays before final analysis. The system proactively identifies and corrects errors caused by contact failures and hair interference by selecting the most reliable light quantity value from the multiple measurements, or by using statistical methods to eliminate outliers. This preliminary correction ensures high reliability in cerebral blood flow measurement without requiring complex additional hardware or post-processing procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the accuracy of internal information detection by reducing errors from contact failures and hair interference, improving the precision of light quantity distribution and cerebral blood flow measurement, and allows for high-precision inverse problem estimation.

Implementation Method 1

a detection system including at least one photodetector to detect an amount of light that is emitted from the irradiation system to an object to be measured and propagated inside the object to be measured

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10292590B2Optical examination method and optical examination device
Publication Date: 2019.05.21 RICOH CO LTD
  • US10292590B2 patent drawing
  • US10292590B2 patent drawing
  • US10292590B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of performing an optical examination on a test object and an optical examination device. The method includes obtaining a first detection light quantity distribution that is a detection light quantity distribution obtained for each of a plurality of optical models that simulate the test object, obtaining, using the optical sensor, a second detection light quantity distribution that is a distribution of an amount of light detected on the test object, and selecting based on the first light quantity distribution and the second detection light quantity distribution, an optical model suited to the test object from the plurality of optical models. The optical examination device includes an optical sensor, and a control system to control the irradiation system to obtain an amount of light detected by the detection system.