Optical Fiber Box with Elevated Rail Receiving Surface
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing optical fiber connection boxes face issues with burrs remaining after cutting breakable zones, which can interfere with the rail seating and lead to poor clipping and unclipping, and existing solutions like using a cutter are dangerous and unsightly.
Innovation Solution
The optical fiber connection box features breakable zones with receiving surfaces positioned above the bottom, allowing for secure rail fixation without interference from burrs, using the upper surface of ribs or flats as rail reception zones.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If breakable zones are cut by hand or using pliers, then the box can be installed on a rail, but burrs remain that interfere with rail seating and cause poor clipping
Solution Approach 1:
The breakable zone is segmented into a cutting portion and a receiving surface portion. The receiving surface is positioned at a different level (above the bottom) of the breakable zone, creating a functional separation where burrs from cutting operations cannot interfere with the rail seating on the elevated receiving surface.
Solution Approach 2:
The receiving surface is positioned at a different vertical level (height dimension) relative to the bottom of the breakable zone. This dimensional offset ensures that burrs remaining at the bottom level do not interfere with the rail contact point on the elevated receiving surface.
2Reliability
If a cutter is used to remove burrs, then rail seating is improved, but the solution is dangerous and involves additional operations
Solution Approach 1:
The receiving surface is pre-positioned at an elevated level during manufacturing, before any cutting operations occur. This preliminary design ensures that future burr formation during installation will not affect the rail seating function, eliminating the need for subsequent burr removal operations.
Solution Approach 2:
The design accepts that burrs will remain after cutting but converts this harmful effect into a non-issue by positioning the functional receiving surface above the burr-prone bottom area. The burrs are effectively isolated from the critical rail seating function.
3Adaptability or versatility
If breakable zones are made visible for rail installation, then rail mounting is enabled, but aesthetics are compromised and dust can enter the box
Solution Approach 1:
Different portions of the breakable zone have different functions: the bottom portion serves as the cutting area (where burrs form), while the elevated receiving surface portion serves as the clean, aesthetic rail seating area. This local differentiation allows each zone to optimize its specific function.
Data Source
Figure 1~2
Figure 3
Figure 4~5
AI summary
The box (1) has rectangular divisible areas arranged on lateral edges (3) of the box, where the box allows positioning of a fixing rail (8) on a rail receiving surface when the divisible areas are cut. The rail receiving surface is located at a level different from bottom of the divisible areas. The rail receiving surface is formed by upper surfaces of ribs (7), where the receiving surface is in projection from a rear surface of the box.