Optical Filter Detection in Surgical Imaging Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern medical imaging systems require manual insertion and verification of optical filters for different imaging modes, leading to user errors and inefficiencies, as users must manually recall and check the required filters, which is time-consuming and prone to mistakes.

Innovation Solution

A medical imaging system equipped with processors and light sources that emit emission light pulses and detect reflected light to automatically identify and determine the presence of optical filters, allowing the system to determine compatible imaging modes and configure itself accordingly without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual filter selection and verification is used, then device complexity is reduced, but user error increases and time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter selection accuracyVSAvoidfilter verification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-verification by automatically detecting which optical filters are installed in the optical path and comparing them against the required filters for the selected imaging mode. The system independently determines filter compatibility without requiring manual user verification, thereby eliminating user error and time consumption while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to the user by displaying information about which filters are detected and whether they are appropriate for the selected imaging mode. This feedback mechanism allows the system to automatically confirm proper filter installation and guide users if incorrect filters are present, improving reliability without manual checking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If manual filter recall and checking is used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter compatibility assuranceVSAvoidimaging mode setup efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs filter detection and compatibility determination without requiring manual user intervention. The processor detects installed filters, compares them with required filters for the selected imaging mode, and determines compatibility automatically, thereby ensuring reliability while significantly improving productivity by eliminating manual setup steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs filter detection and compatibility verification before initiating imaging operations. By conducting this verification in advance, the system ensures that correct filters are installed and compatible with the selected imaging mode, preventing errors and improving efficiency without requiring manual pre-checking by the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If automatic filter detection is implemented, then productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter verification speedVSAvoidsystem component complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system utilizes existing components (light sources, image sensors, processors) already present in the medical imaging system to perform filter detection. By making these components multi-functional, the system achieves automatic filter verification without adding separate dedicated hardware, thereby improving productivity while minimizing the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical inspection of filters with an automated optical detection process. Instead of requiring users to physically check filters, the system uses light emission and detection to automatically identify filter presence and characteristics, improving verification speed while adding only computational complexity rather than mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system automatically ensures the correct optical filters are in place for the selected imaging mode, reducing user errors and increasing efficiency by eliminating the need for manual recall and visual inspection, thus enabling proper imaging operations.

Implementation Method 1

the system may emit one or more emission light pulses, and may detect reflected light therefrom (for example, reflected from a white-balance card or similar surface)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS20240206718A1Systems and methods for optical filter detection and identification
Publication Date: 2024.06.27 STRYKER CORP
  • US20240206718A1 patent drawing
  • US20240206718A1 patent drawing
  • US20240206718A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for identifying optical filters within a surgical imaging device are provided. A system comprises a set of one or more light sources and a set of one or more image sensors of the surgical imaging device. The set of one or more light sources emits a set of one or more emission light pulses. The set of one or more image sensors detects reflection light of the one or more light pulses. The system determines, based at least in part on the detected reflection light, an identity of an optical filter of the surgical imaging device, wherein the optical filter is disposed in an optical collection path of the surgical imaging device.