Optical Fluid Identification via Pseudo Sensor Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Downhole fluid identification in subterranean drilling operations faces challenges due to variations in sample properties, measurement inconsistencies, and the difficulty in matching samples and testing conditions between laboratory and downhole tools.

Innovation Solution

The development of systems and methods for optical fluid identification approximation and calibration, involving the creation of a database with calculated pseudo optical sensor responses and the generation of optical fluid ID prediction models, allowing for the use of abstract optical tools to predict fluid properties and generate pseudo optical sensor responses without direct laboratory data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If measurements from downhole tool are calibrated with measurements from laboratory tool using same samples under same testing conditions, then measurement precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to difficulty in matching samples and testing conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the laboratory measurement system through computational models. Instead of physically matching samples and testing conditions, the system uses calculated pseudo optical sensor responses that replicate laboratory measurement outcomes. This allows downhole tool measurements to be calibrated against virtual laboratory references, eliminating the operational burden of sample matching while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces computational models and algorithms as intermediaries between downhole tool measurements and laboratory standards. These models act as mediators that translate downhole optical sensor responses into calibrated fluid identification results without requiring direct physical comparison with laboratory samples. The intermediary processing layer reconciles differences in measurement conditions while preserving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If samples are collected for laboratory testing, then fluid identification accuracy is improved, but loss of time increases due to sample collection and transportation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid identification accuracyVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical process of sample collection, transportation, and physical laboratory analysis with computational modeling. Optical sensor data from downhole tools is processed through algorithms that simulate laboratory measurement outcomes, eliminating the need for physical sample handling. This substitution maintains fluid identification accuracy while removing time-consuming physical operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary computational calibration and model development before actual downhole measurements are needed. By pre-establishing the relationship between downhole optical responses and fluid properties through computational experiments, the system eliminates the need for time-consuming sample collection and laboratory analysis during field operations. The calibration is done in advance, enabling immediate fluid identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If predictive models are calibrated with laboratory measurements, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases due to need for multiple tools and coordination

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal computational calibration framework that can be applied to multiple downhole optical tools and various fluid identification scenarios. The computational models serve multiple functions: they calibrate different sensor types, handle various fluid properties, and accommodate diverse testing conditions. This multi-functionality maintains reliability across different applications while reducing the need for separate calibration systems for each tool.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses computational copies of laboratory measurement systems to simplify the overall device architecture. Instead of requiring physical laboratory tools to be deployed alongside downhole tools, the system uses virtual models that replicate laboratory capabilities. This copying approach maintains calibration reliability while eliminating the complexity of coordinating multiple physical instruments and facilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9726012B2Systems and methods for optical fluid identification approximation and calibration
Publication Date: 2017.08.08 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US9726012B2 patent drawing
  • US9726012B2 patent drawing
  • US9726012B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for optical fluid identification approximation and calibration are described herein. One example method includes populating a database with a calculated pseudo optical sensor (CPOS) response of a first optical tool to a first sample fluid. The CPOS response of the first optical tool may be based on a transmittance spectrum of a sample fluid and may comprise a complex calculation using selected components of the first optical tool. A first model may be generated based, at least in part, on the database. The first model may receive as an input an optical sensor response and output a predicted fluid property. A second model may also be generated based, at least in part, on the database. The second model may receive as an input at least one known/measured fluid/environmental property value and may output a predicted pseudo optical sensor response of the first optical tool.