Optical Frequency Comparison Using Comb Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for comparing frequency differences between optical signals require a large number of optical-electric converters, leading to complex and expensive systems, especially when dealing with wide frequency bands from low frequencies to over 100 GHz.

Innovation Solution

A method that combines and separates optical signals to compare frequency differences using low-frequency photodetectors, reducing the need for high-frequency converters by generating and shifting optical signals to detect phase differences without direct optical-electric conversion of high-frequency signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional optical-electric conversion methods are used to cover wide frequency bands, then frequency coverage is improved, but the number of converters and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency coverageVSAvoidnumber of converters
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the high-frequency optical signal into multiple lower-frequency components through optical mixing with a comb signal. Instead of directly converting the entire high-frequency band, the signal is divided into manageable frequency segments that can be handled by standard low-frequency photodetectors, thereby reducing the need for multiple high-frequency converters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an optical comb signal as an intermediary element. This comb signal acts as a mediator that enables the conversion of high-frequency optical signals into lower-frequency beat signals through optical mixing. The comb signal facilitates frequency translation without requiring direct high-frequency photodetection, thus simplifying the converter requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If high-frequency photomixers are used for optical-electric conversion, then conversion accuracy is improved, but cost and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency comparison accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the frequency parameter of the optical signal through mixing with a comb signal. By transforming the high-frequency signal into lower-frequency beat signals, the system can use standard low-frequency photodetectors while maintaining frequency comparison accuracy. The parameter transformation occurs in the optical domain before detection, preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple converters are deployed for wideband operation, then frequency range is improved, but phase synchronization difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency rangeVSAvoidphase synchronization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple frequency comparison functions into a single integrated system. By using optical mixing with a comb signal, the system can compare multiple frequency components simultaneously through a single photodetector setup, rather than requiring separate synchronization circuits for each frequency band. This unified approach simplifies phase synchronization across wide frequency ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies the system by reducing the number of converters required and allows for phase synchronization of high-frequency optical signals across a broad frequency range using only low-frequency photodetectors, supporting frequencies from the microwave region to the terahertz region.

Implementation Method 1

an optical coupler for combining the first and second optical signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical interference: Interference

Implementation Method 2

an optical separator for separating the third optical signal into the fourth optical signal and a fifth optical signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical filtering: Filter (optical)

Implementation Method 3

comparing the first frequency difference and the second frequency difference based on a third frequency difference and a fourth frequency difference

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS9991959B2Frequency comparison and phase synchronization in optical signals
Publication Date: 2018.06.05 INTER UNIV RES INST NAT INST OF NATURAL SCI
  • US9991959B2 patent drawing
  • US9991959B2 patent drawing
  • US9991959B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optical oscillator 10 combines optical signals L1′ and L2 to generate an optical signal L3. The optical signal L1′ includes light waves W1′ and W2′ having frequencies spaced apart by a frequency difference Δf1. The optical signal L2 includes light waves W3 and W4 having frequencies spaced apart by a frequency difference Δf2. The optical oscillator 10 separates the optical signal L3 into optical signals L4 and L5, wherein the optical signal L4 includes the light waves W1′ and W3 and the optical signal L5 includes the light waves W2′ and W4. The optical oscillator 10 compares the frequency differences Δf1 and Δf2 based on frequency difference Δf3 between the light waves W1′ and W3 included in the optical signal L4 and frequency difference Δf4 between the light waves W2′ and W4 included in the optical signal L5.