Optical Gas Sensor Layout for Self-Mixing Noise Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optical measurement systems for gas detection suffer from interference patterns caused by self-mixing and etalons due to reflections and scatterings within the system, leading to decreased detection sensitivity and uncontrollable noise, particularly from housing windows and internal components, which are exacerbated by temperature changes and contamination.

Innovation Solution

Optimize the spatial orientation and distance of optoelectronic and optomechanical components relative to the modulation span of the main light beam to minimize interference by carefully selecting optical path length differences, ensuring that interference signals are canceled or minimized at specific demodulation frequencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the light emitter and light detector are arranged with housing windows and internal optical components, then the system can perform gas detection measurements, but interference patterns from reflections and scatterings cause noise that decreases detection sensitivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidinterference patterns from reflections and scatterings
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The housing window is designed with a wedge shape (asymmetric geometry) rather than a parallel plate configuration. This asymmetric wedge geometry causes reflected and scattered light beams to deviate from returning to the light emitter or detector, thereby reducing self-mixing interference and etalon effects while maintaining the protective and transmissive functions of the housing window

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

An anti-reflective coating is applied to the housing window surfaces as an intermediary layer. This coating reduces the reflectivity at the air-glass interfaces, minimizing the generation of scattered light beams that would otherwise cause interference patterns and noise in the measurement signal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If internal optical components such as lenses and mirrors are used to direct the light beam, then the measurement system can function properly, but reflections at these component interfaces create stray light beams that lead to self-mixing and etalons

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidstray light beams from internal components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs beam-absorbing materials (such as black anodized surfaces or absorptive coatings) on internal housing surfaces and component mounts where stray light may reflect. These absorptive surfaces act as disposable-like elements that sacrifice minimal space to eliminate harmful reflections, preventing stray light from completing interference loops

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

Optical components such as lenses and mirrors are mounted at asymmetric angles relative to the optical axis. This asymmetric positioning ensures that reflected beams from these components do not return along the optical path to the detector, thereby eliminating etalon effects and self-mixing while maintaining proper beam direction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Length of stationary object

If the optical path length is increased to improve measurement range, then more gas can be analyzed, but temperature-induced phase changes and path length variations cause time-varying interference patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical path lengthVSAvoidoptical path length stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs temperature compensation techniques where the optical path length or component positions are adjusted as a function of temperature. By changing physical parameters (such as using materials with matched thermal expansion coefficients or active positioning mechanisms), the optical path stability is maintained despite temperature variations, eliminating time-varying interference patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

A reference optical path is created that experiences the same environmental conditions (temperature, pressure) as the measurement path but does not interact with the gas sample. By comparing the measurement signal against this reference copy, temperature-induced phase changes and path length variations are differentiated and compensated, isolating the true absorption signal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If demodulation is performed at higher harmonic frequencies to reduce 1/f noise, then measurement sensitivity improves, but interference signals at these frequencies may still affect the measurement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement sensitivityVSAvoidinterference signal separation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic modulation of the light source frequency or wavelength at a specific modulation frequency, and performs synchronous demodulation at harmonic frequencies. By applying periodic action and locking onto specific harmonic frequencies, the system can distinguish between periodic interference patterns (which occur at different frequencies) and the true absorption signal, thereby improving sensitivity while filtering interference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Significantly reduces interference in the measurement signal, enhancing detection sensitivity by eliminating or reducing noise components, thus improving the clarity of the main signal and extending the system's lifespan by minimizing the impact of temperature-induced phase changes.

Implementation Method 1

at least one scattered light beam of the main light beam, partially reflected/scattered from the main light beam at at least one optically effective interface of at least one optomechanical component in the direction of the light emitter and/or light detector, leads to self-mixing in the light emitter and/or to etalons at the light detector through interference with the main light beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-mixing: Interference

Implementation Method 2

the interference of the main light beam with the scattered light beam results in an interfered main light beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference: Interference

Implementation Method 3

a suitable photodiode as the light detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric conversion: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP3054280B1Optical measuring device and method for gas detection
Publication Date: 2026.04.08 AXETRIS AG
  • EP3054280B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3054280B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2c
  • EP3054280B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3c

AI summary

An optical measuring system (1) and a method for gas detection, comprising a light emitter (4) and at least one light detector (8) arranged in at least one housing, wherein the light emitter emits a modulated main light beam (9) of wavelength λ0 with a modulation span Δλ. At least one optomechanical component (15), for example a housing window, is arranged between the light emitter and the light detector. This component has optically effective interfaces and causes scattered light beams (11) that interfere with the main light beam, resulting in self-mixing and/or etalons. Thus, the detector's measurement signal comprises a main signal component and an unwanted noise signal component. According to the invention, the at least one optomechanical component is arranged relative to the light emitter and/or the light detector at an optimized distance L, which depends on the wavelength λ0 and the modulation span Δλ of the main light beam.The specially chosen distance L ensures that the effect of scattered light rays on the demodulated signal is minimized, leading to an increase in sensor sensitivity.