Optical Grating Impedance Matching Layers Reduce Thickness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing optical gratings face challenges in achieving high efficiency with reduced thickness and decreased polarization dependence, which limits their applicability in telecommunications and other optical implementations.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a grating layer with multiple discrete elongated regions of high and low refractive index materials, surrounded by impedance matching layers to optimize diffraction efficiency and reduce polarization dependence, allowing for thinner grating structures with improved performance across various wavelengths.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of stationary object

If the grating depth is reduced to decrease device thickness, then the device becomes thinner and more compact, but the diffraction efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrating thicknessVSAvoiddiffraction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite grating structure consisting of a silicon nitride grating layer combined with a silicon dioxide impedance matching layer. This composite structure enables the grating to achieve high diffraction efficiency (>90%) while maintaining a reduced thickness of approximately 200 nm, resolving the contradiction between thinness and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the thickness parameter of the impedance matching layer (approximately 100 nm) and the refractive index contrast between the grating layer and surrounding media to enhance diffraction efficiency. By carefully controlling these parameters, the grating achieves high efficiency without requiring increased thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If the grating structure is simplified to reduce manufacturing complexity, then the manufacturing process becomes easier, but the polarization dependence increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrating fabricationVSAvoidpolarization independence
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The addition of the silicon dioxide impedance matching layer creates a composite structure that improves polarization independence. This layer modifies the optical field distribution within the grating, reducing the difference in diffraction efficiency between TE and TM polarizations while maintaining compatibility with standard semiconductor fabrication processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The impedance matching layer is strategically positioned at the interface between the grating and the surrounding medium, where it locally modifies the optical properties. This localized modification addresses the polarization dependence issue without requiring changes to the overall grating geometry or fabrication complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the grating depth is increased to improve diffraction efficiency, then the efficiency increases, but the device thickness increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediffraction efficiencyVSAvoidgrating thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the conventional approach of increasing grating depth with a composite structure using silicon nitride and silicon dioxide layers. This composite design achieves superior diffraction efficiency (>90%) at a total thickness of only about 200 nm, avoiding the need for deep etching while maintaining high performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the high refractive index of silicon nitride and optimizes the thickness and refractive index of the impedance matching layer to maximize diffraction efficiency. These parameter optimizations enable high efficiency without increasing the physical thickness of the grating structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional grating designs are used to maintain manufacturing simplicity, then the fabrication process remains straightforward, but the polarization-dependent loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication simplicityVSAvoidpolarization-dependent loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The silicon dioxide impedance matching layer is integrated into the fabrication process using standard semiconductor techniques such as chemical vapor deposition. This composite structure reduces polarization-dependent loss while maintaining compatibility with existing manufacturing workflows, achieving low PDL without sacrificing fabrication simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration achieves greater than 90% diffraction efficiency with reduced polarization-dependent loss, enabling wider applicability in telecommunications and other optical systems.

Implementation Method 1

Each said impedance matching layer is arranged to reduce reflection of an optical signal transmitted through the corresponding surface of the grating layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpedance matching: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

The bulk refractive index of the dielectric material of the first grating regions is larger than the bulk refractive index of the second grating regions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 3

A wide variety of optical gratings are available for diffracting optical signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffraction: Diffraction

Data Source

PatentUS8989537B2Highly efficient optical gratings with reduced thickness requirements and impedance-matching layers
Publication Date: 2015.03.24 FINISAR CORP
  • US8989537B2 patent drawing
  • US8989537B2 patent drawing
  • US8989537B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optical grating comprising a grating layer and two surface layers, the layers being arranged with the grating layer between the surface layers. The grating layer comprises a set of multiple, discrete, elongated first grating regions that comprise a first dielectric material and are arranged with intervening elongated second grating regions. The bulk refractive index of the dielectric material of the first grating regions is larger than the bulk refractive index of the second grating regions. The first surface layer comprises a first impedance matching layer, and the second surface layer comprises either (i) a second impedance matching layer or (ii) a reflective layer. Each said impedance matching layer is arranged to reduce reflection of an optical signal transmitted through the corresponding surface of the grating layer, relative to reflection of the optical signal in the absence of said impedance matching layer.