Optical Inspection Drift Detection for Assembly Unit Defects

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current optical inspection methods lack efficiency in predicting defects in assembly units in real-time and identifying manufacturing drift, leading to potential yield reduction and waste, as they rely on manual inspection and limited data analysis.

Innovation Solution

A method that utilizes multi-dimensional feature vectors from inspection images to group similar assembly units, detect defects, and predict anomalies by analyzing trends over time, enabling real-time identification of defective units and manufacturing drift through machine learning techniques and clustering algorithms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual inspection methods are used, then inspection simplicity is maintained, but inspection efficiency and defect detection accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection efficiencyVSAvoidinspection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection with an automated optical inspection system that captures images and uses machine learning algorithms to detect defects. This substitution dramatically improves inspection efficiency and accuracy while reducing human labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies (images) of assembly units and uses these copies for analysis instead of direct physical inspection. This allows multiple analyses to be performed on the same unit without additional physical handling, improving efficiency while maintaining simplicity in the physical inspection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If limited data analysis is used, then data processing complexity is reduced, but defect prediction accuracy and manufacturing drift identification deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect prediction accuracyVSAvoiddata analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data processing by extracting relevant features from images before defect detection. This preprocessing step organizes data in advance, enabling more accurate defect prediction without requiring excessively complex real-time analysis during inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the complex data analysis task into distinct components: image capture, feature extraction, vector generation, clustering analysis, and defect prediction. This segmentation makes the overall complex system manageable and allows each component to be optimized independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If real-time defect detection is implemented, then yield protection is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield protectionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary clustering and feature extraction on historical data before real-time inspection. When a new assembly unit is inspected, the system only needs to compare its features against pre-established clusters, significantly reducing real-time processing time while maintaining accurate defect detection and yield protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial real-time processing by performing only the critical comparison operations in real-time while leaving heavier computational tasks (clustering, feature extraction) to be performed beforehand on historical data. This balance provides sufficient yield protection without excessive real-time processing demands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10984526B2Method for predicting defects in assembly units
Publication Date: 2021.04.20 INSTRUMENTAL INC
  • US10984526B2 patent drawing
  • US10984526B2 patent drawing
  • US10984526B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One variation of a method for predicting manufacturing defects includes: accessing a first set of inspection images of a first set of assembly units recorded by an optical inspection station over a first period of time; generating a first set of vectors representing features extracted from the first set of inspection images; grouping neighboring vectors in a multi-dimensional feature space into a set of vector groups; accessing a second inspection image of a second assembly recorded by the optical inspection station at a second time succeeding the first period of time; detecting a second set of features in the second inspection image; generating a second vector representing the second set of features in the multi-dimensional feature space; and, in response to the second vector deviating from the set of vector groups by more than a threshold difference, flagging the second assembly unit.