Interference-Coated Optical Lens Marking With Selective Laser Ablation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for marking ophthalmic lenses, such as ink and laser marking, face challenges with visibility to the wearer, lack of control over marking depth, and potential damage to coatings like anti-reflective layers.

Innovation Solution

A method using a laser beam with a specific wavelength to ablate the inner layer of a multi-layer interference coating, where the inner layer absorbs the marking wavelength more significantly than other layers, allowing controlled and localized marking that is visible to observers but not the wearer, with minimal impact on the coating.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Illumination intensity

If laser beam marking is used on optical lenses, then marking visibility to external observers is improved, but control over marking depth deteriorates and coating damage occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarking visibilityVSAvoidmarking depth control
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The interference coating is divided into multiple layers with different optical properties. The marking process selectively targets specific layers (e.g., the high-index layer) while preserving others, enabling controlled depth modulation. This segmentation allows the marking depth to be precisely controlled by adjusting which layers are affected, resolving the contradiction between visibility and depth control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different layers of the interference coating are given different functional properties - some layers are designed to be more laser-absorbent than others. By selecting a wavelength that preferentially interacts with specific layers, the marking process achieves localized modification at controlled depths, improving both visibility and depth control simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Illumination intensity

If laser beam energy is increased to improve marking visibility, then marking depth increases, but coating integrity deteriorates due to excessive ablation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarking visibilityVSAvoidcoating damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The laser wavelength is specifically selected to match the absorption characteristics of particular coating layers. By tuning the wavelength parameter, the process achieves effective marking at lower energy levels, avoiding excessive ablation and coating damage while maintaining sufficient visibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The interference coating layers themselves act as intermediaries that mediate the laser energy interaction. Certain layers absorb laser energy preferentially and convert it to controlled ablation, protecting underlying layers from damage. This intermediary mechanism enables visible marking without excessive coating degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If ink marking is used on optical lenses, then marking application is simplified, but visibility to the wearer deteriorates and permanence is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarking applicationVSAvoidmarking permanence and visibility control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical ink application process is replaced with a laser-based optical field approach. The laser marking process directly modifies the coating material through photothermal or photomechanical effects, eliminating the need for ink application while achieving permanent, controlled markings that are invisible to the wearer but visible externally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple partial ablations are performed in the same pixel to avoid excessive engraving, then coating damage is reduced, but marking continuity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating damageVSAvoidmarking continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The coating structure is segmented into multiple layers that can be selectively removed. By targeting specific layers for ablation rather than repeatedly ablating the same depth, the process achieves continuous-looking markings without excessive local damage, as each layer removal contributes to the overall marking pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The laser marking process uses periodic pulsed delivery with carefully controlled timing and positioning. This periodic action allows heat dissipation between pulses and prevents excessive local heating while building up continuous markings through sequential pulse application, maintaining both coating integrity and marking continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Achieves a visible and controlled marking pattern on ophthalmic lenses that maintains the integrity of the interference coating, ensuring the marking is not visible to the wearer while enhancing visibility to external observers.

Implementation Method 1

The inner layer absorbing the marking wavelength more significantly than any layer located between the electromagnetic source and the inner layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption (EM radiation): Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

exposure of at least the inner layer at a given point called the marking point, by means of the laser beam at the marking wavelength, so as to ablate, at the marking point, the inner layer over at least part of its thickness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Implementation Method 3

so as to ablate, at the marking point, the inner layer over at least part of its thickness, and any layer located between the electromagnetic source and the inner layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAblation: Ablation

Implementation Method 4

the interference coating being such that it has a reflection coefficient Re in the visible range (380-780 nm)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference: Interference

Data Source

PatentEP3485324B1Visible permanent marking process on optical article and marked optical article
Publication Date: 2025.09.10 ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL(COMPAGNIE GENERALE D OPTIQUE)
  • EP3485324B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3485324B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP3485324B1 patent drawingFigure 6~9

AI summary

A method for marking an optical article (20) coated with an interference coating comprising at least two layers, an inner layer (15) and an outer layer (14), and having reflection coefficient Re; by exposure of the inner layer (15), at a marking point (P), by means of a laser beam at a marking wavelength, in such a way as to ablate the inner layer and any layer further away from the substrate; the ablated area having a reflection coefficient Rm different from Re by at least 1%; the inner layer absorbing the marking wavelength to a greater degree than any layer further away from the substrate. The invention also relates to an optical article coated with an interference coating having at least two layers, an inner layer and an outer layer, said article comprising a marking pattern formed by local absence of layers.