Optical Lens Preform Molding with Dual Temperature Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing optical moldings, particularly optical lenses, face challenges in achieving excellent optical quality with reduced internal stresses and long cooling times due to the use of high mold temperatures, which are necessary for optimal tool temperatures but result in inefficient production processes.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the production of a preform at a lower mold temperature (between 60°C and 80°C) and a cover layer at a higher temperature (between 90°C and 130°C), with reduced pressure, allowing for simultaneous injection molding of cover layers and using transparent thermoplastics like polycarbonate, which reduces internal stresses and shortens cooling times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If high mold temperature is used for optimal tool temperature, then optical quality is improved, but cooling time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical qualityVSAvoidcooling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The molding process is segmented into two distinct stages with different temperature requirements: preform molding at lower temperature (60-80°C) and cover layer molding at higher temperature (90-130°C). This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently, reducing overall cooling time while maintaining optical quality in the final product.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The preform is molded first at a lower temperature to establish the basic structure, and then the cover layer is molded over it at the optimal temperature for optical quality. This preliminary action approach allows the final optical surfaces to be formed at optimal temperatures without requiring the entire mold to be at high temperature throughout the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Stability of the object's composition

If high mold temperature is used, then internal stresses are reduced, but production time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinternal stressesVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The process is divided into two temperature zones: the preform stage uses lower temperature (60-80°C) for rapid cooling and high productivity, while the cover layer stage uses higher temperature (90-130°C) to reduce internal stresses in the optical surfaces. This segmentation allows both objectives to be achieved in different stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different temperature conditions are applied to different parts of the molding process: the preform (internal structure) is molded at lower temperature, while the cover layers (optical surfaces) are molded at higher temperature. This local quality approach ensures that each region receives the temperature treatment most appropriate for its function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If optimal tool temperature is used for each layer, then optical quality is maintained, but production efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical qualityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The optimal temperature is applied selectively only to the cover layer stage (90-130°C), while the preform stage operates at lower temperature (60-80°C). This segmentation maintains optical quality where it matters most (at the optical surfaces) while improving overall production efficiency through reduced cooling time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mold temperature parameter is changed between stages: lower temperature (60-80°C) for preform molding to improve efficiency, then higher temperature (90-130°C) for cover layer molding to ensure optical quality. This dynamic parameter change optimizes both productivity and quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of optical moldings with improved optical imaging properties and reduced internal stresses while significantly reducing production time and maintaining high-quality surface impressions.

Implementation Method 1

injection molding a first thermoplastic and at least one cover layer is produced on the preform by injection molding a second thermoplastic

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

the temperature of the mold to produce the preform being at 30% to 60%, based on the temperature in °C, is lower than the temperature of the mold for producing the at least one cover layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal gradient: Temperature Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP2643135B1Method for producing molded optical parts
Publication Date: 2017.12.27 COVESTRO DEUTSCHLAND AG
  • EP2643135B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2643135B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2643135B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for producing a molded optical part (2), in particular a lens element (2), by producing a preform (4) in a molding tool by injection molding a first plastic, and by producing at least one covering layer (6.1, 6.2) on the preform (4) by injection molding a second plastic, the temperature of the molding tool for producing the preform (4) being 30% to 60% lower than the temperature of the molding tool for producing the at least one covering layer (6.1, 6.2).