Optical Lens Suitability Assessment for Progressive Addition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users of progressive addition lenses often face difficulties adapting to the lenses due to aberrations leading to blur, reduced field of view, and distortion, which can result in a learning phase where users may misuse the lenses or experience frustration, leading to discontinuation of use.

Innovation Solution

A method implemented by computer means to assess the suitability between an optical device, such as progressive addition lenses, and the user, involving a requesting step where the user uses the device in various visual situations, and a suitability index assessing step where the user evaluates their experience, providing a comprehensive assessment of comfort, fatigue, and difficulty in using the device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If progressive addition lenses are designed with multiple optical zones for different vision distances, then the versatility and functional capability are improved, but optical aberrations and distortions increase leading to user discomfort and difficulty in adaptation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional capabilityVSAvoidoptical aberrations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The lens is divided into multiple optical zones (distance, intermediate, and near vision zones) with different optical powers, allowing the lens to provide corrected vision for multiple distances simultaneously. This segmentation enables the lens to adapt to different visual requirements while maintaining optical functionality in each zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the lens are designed with different optical properties - the upper portion for distance vision, middle portion for intermediate vision, and lower portion for near vision. Each zone has optimized optical characteristics tailored to its specific function, creating local quality variations that address different visual needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If users are provided with progressive addition lenses, then the functional capability for multiple vision distances is improved, but the difficulty of operation increases during the learning phase due to distortions and reduced field of view

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional capabilityVSAvoiddifficulty of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

A suitability assessment is conducted before lens dispensing to evaluate whether the user is likely to successfully adapt to progressive addition lenses. This preliminary action identifies users who may struggle with the learning curve, allowing for preventive measures or alternative lens choices before the difficulty of operation becomes a problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The suitability assessment provides feedback to both the user and optician about the expected adaptation challenges. This feedback mechanism helps set realistic expectations and informs decision-making about whether progressive addition lenses are appropriate for the specific user, thereby managing the difficulty of operation beforehand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If a comprehensive suitability assessment method is implemented, then the reliability of user-lens matching is improved, but the complexity of the dispensing process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser-lens matchingVSAvoidcomplexity of dispensing process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The suitability assessment serves multiple functions: it evaluates user adaptability, predicts potential difficulties, guides lens selection decisions, and provides a framework for managing expectations. This multi-functionality allows a single assessment process to address various aspects of user-lens matching, improving reliability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The assessment methodology provides a structured approach that enables opticians to systematically evaluate users and make informed decisions. By establishing clear assessment criteria and procedures, the system empowers practitioners to reliably determine suitability without requiring overly complex external tools or processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12310659B2Method for assessing the suitability between an optical device and a user of the optical device
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL(COMPAGNIE GENERALE D OPTIQUE)
  • US12310659B2 patent drawing
  • US12310659B2 patent drawing
  • US12310659B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a computer-implemented method for assessing suitability between an optical device and its user, the optical device including an optical lens placed in front of an eye of the user when the user uses the optical device, the optical lens having a plurality of optical zones having different optical functions, the method including at least the following steps: a requesting step, during which the user, equipped with the optical device, is requested to use the optical device in a plurality of different visual situations, each visual situation being associated with an optical zone of the optical lens and during which the user looks at a visual target located in the user's natural environment through the optical lens; and a suitability index assessing step, during which the user assesses a suitability index based on his use of the optical device in the plurality of different visual situations.