Optical Link Fault Identification Using Dynamic Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current optical fiber communication systems face challenges with low fault handling efficiency and long rectification delays due to ineffective alert prompts and inaccurate fault mode identification, leading to complex operations and user impact.

Innovation Solution

An optical link fault identification method that extracts feature parameters from performance data, such as receive optical power, to accurately identify fault modes without manual threshold settings, using a fault mode identification model trained with historical data for timely and efficient fault processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a conventional alert system with manually specified baseline thresholds is used, then the system can detect faults, but the accuracy is low due to missed alerts or false alerts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoidalert reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms fixed manually-specified thresholds into dynamic thresholds that adapt based on historical performance data and environmental conditions. The system continuously learns from past data to adjust detection parameters, thereby improving both accuracy and reliability of fault detection without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-diagnosis and self-adjustment by automatically analyzing its own performance data to establish dynamic thresholds. This eliminates dependence on manual threshold configuration and enables the system to autonomously improve its detection accuracy over time through continuous learning from operational data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual troubleshooting is performed based on alert prompts, then faults can be identified, but the efficiency is low and the delay in fault rectification is excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault handling efficiencyVSAvoidfault rectification delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical troubleshooting with an automated intelligent diagnosis system that uses machine learning algorithms to analyze performance data and identify fault modes. This substitution eliminates the time-consuming manual analysis process and enables rapid automated fault identification and rectification recommendations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary fault analysis and generates diagnostic results automatically as soon as anomalies are detected, eliminating the need to wait for manual intervention. By pre-configuring automated diagnosis workflows and having the system continuously monitor and analyze data, fault rectification can begin immediately without human delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If performance data at a single time point is used for determination, then the process is simple, but missed alerts or false alerts are prone to occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring system complexityVSAvoidfault detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic sampling and continuous monitoring of performance data over time, analyzing trends across multiple time points rather than relying on single instantaneous measurements. This temporal dimension adds robustness to fault detection by distinguishing genuine faults from transient anomalies, improving precision without requiring overly complex real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis on historical performance data to establish baseline behaviors and normal variation patterns before actual fault detection occurs. This pre-processing creates a reference framework that simplifies real-time monitoring while significantly improving detection precision by comparing current data against learned historical patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11870490B2Optical link fault identification method, apparatus and system
Publication Date: 2024.01.09 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US11870490B2 patent drawing
  • US11870490B2 patent drawing
  • US11870490B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This application provides an optical link fault identification method, and relate to the field of communications technologies. The method includes: obtaining performance data of a network device, extracting a feature parameter of the performance data, and identifying a fault mode on an optical link based on the feature parameter. The method resolves problems of a difficulty in fault identification and slow troubleshooting that are caused by a large quantity of devices, many line faults, and a difficulty in obtaining manual troubleshooting cases. In addition, a fault can be quickly identified when the fault occurs, improving troubleshooting efficiency. When an optical link risk does not cause a fault, deterioration of the performance data can be found in advance based on a feature, to perform identification and warning.