Universal Optical Mesh Layouts With Shorter Paths and Balanced Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing universal linear optical meshes, such as the Reck triangular scheme, face issues with unequal loss and phase distribution due to varying numbers of couplers in different waveguides, and have a large optical path length, making them unsuitable for practical implementation in optical hardware with manufacturing constraints.

Innovation Solution

A method for generating revised layouts of universal linear optical meshes by substituting coupler arrangements in known layouts, allowing for the creation of multiple alternative designs that can be mapped onto existing optical hardware, minimizing the use of underperforming components and optimizing optical depth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the Reck triangular scheme is used for universal linear optical mesh, then the layout is simple and well-defined, but the optical path length becomes large (2n) and loss/phase distribution becomes unequal across waveguides

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout simplicityVSAvoidoptical path length
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the structural parameters of the optical mesh by introducing alternative coupler arrangements (different connectivity patterns) that reduce the optical path length while maintaining the universal linear optical mesh functionality. This involves modifying the topological parameters of the network to achieve shorter paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of following the traditional Reck triangular scheme structure, the patent inverts the approach by using non-triangular coupler arrangements and alternative topologies that achieve the same universal functionality with reduced optical path length. This inversion of the conventional design paradigm leads to improved performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Device complexity

If the Reck triangular scheme is used for universal linear optical mesh, then the layout is well-defined, but unequal loss and phase distribution occur due to varying numbers of couplers in different waveguides

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout definitionVSAvoidloss and phase distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating heterogeneous coupler arrangements where different regions of the optical mesh have different connectivity patterns tailored to balance the overall system performance. This local variation in structure compensates for the unequal path lengths and achieves more uniform loss and phase distribution across all waveguides.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces asymmetric coupler arrangements that deliberately break the symmetry of the traditional Reck scheme. By using asymmetric topologies, the design compensates for the unequal number of couplers experienced by different waveguides, achieving more balanced loss and phase characteristics through asymmetric path balancing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Ease of manufacture

If existing universal linear optical mesh layouts are used, then implementation is straightforward, but manufacturing constraints cause components to not perform at expected levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation straightforwardnessVSAvoidcomponent performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary design optimization by generating multiple candidate layouts before manufacturing, allowing selection of designs that are more tolerant of manufacturing variations. This pre-manufacturing optimization ensures that the chosen layout can achieve reliable performance even with component imperfections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the design parameters to create layouts with more uniform component utilization, reducing the sensitivity to manufacturing variations. By redistributing the optical paths and coupler connections, the design becomes more robust against manufacturing constraints and component performance variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The revised layouts provide improved options for implementing universal linear optical meshes on optical hardware, addressing manufacturing constraints and optimizing performance by reducing coupler usage and optical path length, enabling practical applications in quantum computing and optical operations.

Implementation Method 1

A universal linear optical mesh comprises a plurality of waveguides and a plurality of couplers wherein each coupler couples two waveguides

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWaveguide: Waveguide (optics)

Implementation Method 2

each coupler couples two waveguides. A mode of light in a fully connected linear optical mesh can couple between waveguides via the couplers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoupling:

Data Source

PatentEP4703960A1Finding new practical implementations of universal linear optical meshes
Publication Date: 2026.03.04 QUIX QUANTUM BV
  • EP4703960A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4703960A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4703960A1 patent drawingFigure 3(1)~3(2)

AI summary

A method of generating a revised layout for implementing a universal linear optical mesh is defined. The method comprises starting with a known layout of a universal optical mesh, wherein: the known layout of the universal linear optical mesh comprises: a plurality of waveguides; and a plurality of couplers distributed over a plurality of interaction stages, wherein each coupler couples two of the waveguides. The method further comprises generating the revised layout by: identifying in the known layout a first arrangement of three couplers across three consecutive waveguides and obtaining the revised layout by replacing the first arrangement of three couplers with a second arrangement of three couplers.