Optical Metrology for Spatial Deposition Thickness Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for measuring substrate deposition processes are either destructive, leading to unusable substrates, or rely on erroneous assumptions about uniformity across different regions of a substrate, resulting in non-uniformity and malfunctioning substrates.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize optical metrology data and structure data from a known region of a substrate to determine the growth rate of that region, and then predict the thickness data of regions without known structure data, allowing for non-destructive and accurate measurement of substrate deposition processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If destructive metrology methods are used to measure substrate deposition, then measurement accuracy is improved, but substrate usability deteriorates (substrates become unusable)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidsubstrate usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses optical metrology to create an optical copy or representation of the substrate surface properties without physically contacting or damaging the substrate. By measuring optical properties (reflectance, absorbance, etc.), the system obtains accurate thickness and uniformity data while preserving substrate integrity for continued use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces destructive mechanical or chemical measurement methods with non-destructive optical measurement methods. Instead of physically sectioning, etching, or otherwise mechanically interfering with the substrate to obtain thickness measurements, the system uses light interaction (reflectance, absorbance, ellipsometry) to achieve the same measurement goals without damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If erroneous assumptions about uniformity are made across substrate regions, then measurement simplicity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates (non-uniformity and malfunctioning substrates)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement simplicityVSAvoidsubstrate uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the substrate into multiple discrete regions (first region with known structure data, second region with unknown structure data) and applies different measurement and prediction strategies to each. Rather than treating the entire substrate uniformly, the system segments it to enable accurate local measurements in known regions and predictive modeling in unknown regions, thereby capturing spatial variations in deposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from assuming uniform deposition parameters across all regions to using region-specific growth rates determined from optical metrology data. The system measures actual deposition parameters (growth rates, thickness) in known regions and uses these measured parameters to predict properties in unknown regions, rather than assuming uniformity based on simplified models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If optical metrology data is used to predict thickness in regions without structure data, then substrate usability is improved (non-destructive measurement), but measurement precision may deteriorate (prediction uncertainty)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate usabilityVSAvoidthickness measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback from optical metrology measurements in known regions to refine and validate the predictive model for unknown regions. By continuously comparing predicted thickness values with actual measured values in regions where structure data is available, the system can calibrate and improve the accuracy of predictions in regions where structure data is unknown, thereby reducing prediction uncertainty while maintaining non-destructive measurement benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the prediction of thickness data for regions with unknown structure data, reducing non-uniformity and substrate malfunctions, while also saving time, energy, and resources by avoiding destructive metrology and erroneous assumptions.

Implementation Method 1

receiving optical metrology data of the substrate associated with one or more substrate deposition processes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection (reflectance/absorbance/ellipsometry): Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS12211717B2Spatial pattern loading measurement with imaging metrology
Publication Date: 2025.01.28 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US12211717B2 patent drawing
  • US12211717B2 patent drawing
  • US12211717B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes identifying first structure data of a first region of a substrate and receiving optical metrology data of the substrate associated with one or more substrate deposition processes in a processing chamber. The method further includes determining, based on the optical metrology data and the first structure data, a first growth rate of the first region of the substrate associated with the one or more substrate deposition processes. The method further includes predicting, based on the optical metrology data and the first growth rate, thickness data of a second region of the substrate without second structure data of the second region.