Optical Module Frame with Reinforced Shaft for Stable Actuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In projector systems, the uniform thickness of metal frame bodies leads to simultaneous deformation of frame and shaft portions during actuation, affecting actuation stability and response speed due to similar structural strengths.

Innovation Solution

The optical module design includes a frame body with a shaft portion and frame portion, where the reinforcement structure and positioning structures extend in specific directions to create a greater structural strength in the frame portion compared to the shaft portion, allowing the shaft to withstand deformation stress and improve actuation stability and response speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a uniform thickness metal frame body is used, then manufacturing is simple, but both frame portion and shaft portion deform simultaneously during actuation, reducing actuation stability and response speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidactuation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The frame body transitions from uniform thickness to non-uniform thickness distribution. The shaft portion has reduced thickness (t1) compared to the frame portion (t2), creating localized structural differences. This allows the shaft to be more flexible while the frame remains rigid, ensuring stable actuation where only the shaft deforms during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The frame body is segmented into distinct functional zones: the shaft portion for rotation and deformation, and the frame portion for structural support. This segmentation is achieved through different thickness regions and the addition of reinforcement structures, allowing each part to perform its specific function independently during actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If a uniform thickness metal frame body is used, then material usage is uniform, but structural strengths of frame portion and shaft portion are similar, causing simultaneous deformation and reducing response speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial distributionVSAvoidresponse speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The thickness parameter is locally optimized: the shaft portion has thickness t1 while the frame portion has greater thickness t2. This local differentiation creates the desired strength gradient where the shaft is more compliant for rapid response while the frame provides structural stability, directly improving actuation response speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The thickness parameter of the frame body is changed from a uniform value to a spatially varying value. By reducing thickness in the shaft region and maintaining or increasing it in the frame region (enhanced by reinforcement structures), the structural strength distribution is adjusted to enable faster response while maintaining overall rigidity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If reinforcement structures are added to the frame body, then structural strength of frame portion increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strength of frame portionVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement structures are integrated directly into the frame body as a unified component rather than separate attachments. The reinforcement regions are formed as continuous extensions of the frame portion with varying thickness, combining the frame and reinforcement functions into a single manufactured part, thus increasing strength without proportionally increasing assembly complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Reinforcement structures are added only in specific regions where structural strength is needed, rather than uniformly throughout the entire frame body. This localized reinforcement approach increases strength where necessary while minimizing the overall complexity and material usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances actuation stability and response speed of the optical module, leading to increased image resolution in projection devices by ensuring the shaft portion bears most of the deformation stress while maintaining structural integrity.

Implementation Method 1

the shaft portion bears most of the deformation stress while maintaining structural integrity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

the image beam is refracted to another position by the glass, thereby achieving an effect of increasing a resolution of a projected image

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Data Source

PatentUS11372236B2Optical module and projection device
Publication Date: 2022.06.28 CORETRONIC CORPORATION
  • US11372236B2 patent drawing
  • US11372236B2 patent drawing
  • US11372236B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optical module includes a frame body and an optical element. The frame body includes at least one fixing portion, at least one frame portion and at least one shaft portion connected to the fixing portion and the frame portion. The frame portion includes at least one main body, a plurality of positioning structures and at least one reinforcement structure. A part of an inner side surface of the main body is bended toward a thickness direction of the frame body to form the positioning structures, and the reinforcement structure is connected to the main body and extends in the thickness direction. The frame portion oscillates relative to the fixing portion around the shaft portion. In the thickness direction, a sum of a height of the reinforcement structure and a thickness of the main body is greater than a thickness of the shaft portion.