Optical Proximity Detector Open Loop Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optical proximity detectors face challenges in accurately detecting distance and motion due to dynamic variations in gain and phase offsets, crosstalk, and residual errors, which affect the precision and reliability of distance measurements.

Innovation Solution

The optical proximity detector employs a digital back-end circuitry that includes dynamic gain and phase offset correction, crosstalk correction, and static phase offset correction, along with precision estimation, using IQ demodulation and calibration techniques to enhance accuracy and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If dynamic gain and phase offset correction is implemented, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistance measurement precisionVSAvoidcircuitry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs gain and phase offset corrections in advance through calibration procedures before actual distance measurements are taken. The system pre-determines correction values and applies them during operation, which improves measurement precision without requiring complex real-time computation during the actual measurement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate correction signals and calibration data as mediators between the raw detector output and the final distance measurement. These intermediate elements facilitate the correction of dynamic variations without requiring direct complex processing of the primary measurement signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If crosstalk correction is applied, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and separates the crosstalk component from the total detected signal through dedicated calibration measurements. By isolating the crosstalk effect during calibration and removing it through subtraction or compensation, the system improves detection reliability without requiring complex real-time filtering during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If multiple correction techniques are used, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistance measurement precisionVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs multiple correction calibrations in advance during manufacturing or initial setup, storing the correction parameters for later use. This preliminary action allows the system to apply pre-computed corrections during operation without incurring time penalties during actual distance measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a hierarchical correction approach where essential corrections are applied continuously while less critical corrections are applied periodically or selectively. This partial action approach maintains measurement precision while reducing the overall time burden of multiple correction techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution improves the accuracy and reliability of distance measurements by compensating for dynamic variations and residual errors, providing precise distance and motion detection, and enabling precise control of subsystems in applications like mobile devices.

Implementation Method 1

detect the presence of an object, estimate proximity of (e.g., distance to) an object and/or detect motion of an object, based on the light originating from the light source that is reflected from an object and detected by the light detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

Where such detectors rely on time-of-flight (TOF) principles to detect distance to an object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Implementation Method 3

an adjacent photosensitive light detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10534446B2Open loop correction for optical proximity detectors
Publication Date: 2020.01.14 INTERSIL AMERICAS INC
  • US10534446B2 patent drawing
  • US10534446B2 patent drawing
  • US10534446B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optical proximity detector includes a driver, light detector, analog front-end, sensor(s) that sense correction factor(s) (e.g., temperature, supply voltage and/or forward voltage drop), and a digital back end. The driver drives the light source to emit light. The light detector produces a light detection signal indicative of a magnitude and a phase of a portion of the emitted light that reflects off an object and is incident on the light detector. The analog front-end receives the light detection signal and outputs a digital light detection signal, or digital in-phase and quadrature-phase signals, which are provided to the digital back-end. The digital back-end performs closed loop correction(s) for dynamic variation(s) in gain and/or phase caused by a portion of the analog front-end, uses polynomial equation(s) and sensed correction factor(s) to perform open loop correction(s) for dynamic variations in temperature, supply voltage and/or forward voltage drop, and outputs a distance value.