Optical Proximity Sensor for 2D Touch Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing one-dimensional arrays of proximity sensors are not accurate enough to determine a two-dimensional location of a pointer within a two-dimensional plane, limiting their effectiveness in applications such as door lock systems, laptop touchscreen conversion, and in-vehicle infotainment systems.

Innovation Solution

A proximity sensor system using a one-dimensional array of alternating light emitters and detectors to provide two-dimensional touch detection, with a three-dimensional touch or hover detection capability, and a GUI for in-vehicle infotainment systems offering context-driven and hierarchical navigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a one-dimensional array of proximity sensors is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision for two-dimensional location determination is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor array structureVSAvoidtwo-dimensional location accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dimensionality change by using a one-dimensional array of proximity sensors to detect two-dimensional touch locations. The system achieves 2D location determination by mathematically processing the depth information from multiple 1D sensor measurements, effectively converting a 1D physical array into a 2D detection capability through computational geometry and trigonometric calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If alternating light emitters and detectors are used in a one-dimensional array, then two-dimensional touch detection capability is enabled, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetwo-dimensional touch detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor array configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the touch detection function into multiple independent light emitters and detectors arranged in alternating positions along a one-dimensional array. Each emitter-detector pair independently measures depth at its specific location, and the system integrates these segmented measurements to reconstruct the complete two-dimensional touch location, thereby achieving 2D detection through 1D segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If three-dimensional touch or hover detection is implemented, then the functionality is enhanced, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch and hover detection capabilityVSAvoidthree-dimensional gesture recognition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces light as an intermediary medium to enable three-dimensional touch and hover detection. Light emitters project light into the detection volume, and light detectors receive reflected or scattered light from objects at different 3D positions. The system uses light travel time, intensity, and angular information as intermediaries to calculate three-dimensional coordinates, making 3D detection feasible through optical mediation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate two-dimensional touch detection and three-dimensional gesture recognition, enhancing user interaction in various applications by converting non-touchscreen laptops into touchscreen devices and providing intuitive navigation in vehicle infotainment systems.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of light detectors for detecting reflections of the light projected by the emitters by a reflective object in the detection plane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP3250989B1Optical proximity sensor and associated user interface
Publication Date: 2021.09.08 NEONODE INC
  • EP3250989B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3250989B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3250989B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A proximity sensor including a housing, light emitters in the housing projecting light out of the housing along a detection plane, light detectors in the housing detecting amounts of light entering the housing along the detection plane, whereby for each emitter-detector pair (E, D), when an object is located at a target position p(E, D) in the detection plane, corresponding to the pair (E, D), then light emitted by emitter E is scattered by the object and is expected to be maximally detected by detector D, and a processor to synchronously activate emitter-detector pairs, to read the detected amounts of light from the detectors, and to calculate a location of the object in the detection plane from the detected amounts of light, in accordance with a detection-location relationship that relates detections from emitter-detector pairs to object locations between neighboring target positions in the detection plane.