Optical quality control system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cooking devices for commercial use are complex and prone to frequent repairs, and lack a reliable method to ensure that food is cooked according to the correct cycle and meets quality standards, often resulting in undercooked or improperly cooked food being served.

Innovation Solution

A cooking device equipped with a distance sensor and digital optical recognition system that captures images of the food for recognition and quality analysis, ensuring the correct cooking cycle is selected and completed, and that the food meets quality standards by comparing images to a database of properly cooked food.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If complex identification systems (RFID, bar code readers, digital optical recognition) are used to identify food and select cooking cycles, then cooking cycle selection accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking cycle selection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the cooking device into distinct functional modules: an identification module (with RFID, bar code reader, or digital optical recognition) and a control module. Each module performs a specific function, allowing the system to achieve accurate cooking cycle selection while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control module is designed to work with multiple types of identification systems (RFID tags, bar codes, digital images) through a unified interface. This multi-functionality allows the system to achieve accurate food identification and cooking cycle selection without requiring separate dedicated systems for each identification method, thereby reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple sensors and recognition devices are added to monitor cooking quality, then food quality control is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood quality controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple monitoring functions (visual inspection, temperature sensing, quality analysis) into an integrated inspection system that operates within the existing cooking device architecture. By merging these functions into a unified system rather than adding separate independent systems, the patent achieves reliable food quality control while minimizing the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection system continuously monitors cooking progress and provides feedback to the control module, which automatically adjusts cooking parameters to maintain quality standards. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures reliable quality control without requiring complex manual intervention systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If automated inspection systems are implemented to verify cooked food quality, then cooking error reduction is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking error reductionVSAvoidoperator simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system is designed to automatically perform quality verification and provide pass/fail indications without requiring operators to manually inspect each item. The system serves itself by automatically comparing actual cooking results against predefined quality standards, thereby reducing cooking errors while maintaining ease of operation through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Manufacturing precision

If distance sensors and optical recognition devices are used to track food placement, then cooking precision is improved, but ease of repair deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood placement precisionVSAvoidsystem maintainability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the precision measurement functions (distance sensing, optical recognition) into distinct modular components that can be independently accessed and maintained. This segmentation allows technicians to repair or replace individual sensor modules without affecting the entire cooking device, thereby maintaining high food placement precision while improving ease of repair.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system significantly reduces cooking errors, ensuring that food is consistently cooked to the correct standard, eliminating the risk of serving undercooked food and simplifying the cooking process for operators.

Implementation Method 1

a distance sensor that detects the position of the food product carrier in the cooking chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistance sensing:

Implementation Method 2

a digital optical recognition device that captures a series of product images for the purpose(s) of food product recognition and of quality analysis of the state of the food product having been cooked

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical recognition:

Data Source

PatentUS9538880B2Optical quality control system
Publication Date: 2017.01.10 WELBILT DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
  • US9538880B2 patent drawing
  • US9538880B2 patent drawing
  • US9538880B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are cooking devices having inspection systems including: a distance sensor and a digital optical recognition device. The distance sensor detects the position of the food product placed in the cooking device and the digital optical recognition device captures a series of images for the purpose of food product recognition. Once the food product is recognized, the operator is provided with the correct cooking cycle/program for the position and type of food product placed in the cooking device. The inspection systems also ensure that the food product has been properly cooked at the end of the cooking cycle/program. The inspection systems ensure: (1) the food product is correctly recognized; (2) the cooking cycle/program is correctly selected; (3) the correct cooking cycle/program is followed to completion and (4) the quality of the cooked food product meets expected standards.