Optical Receiver Sensitivity System for Free-Space Communications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Atmospheric turbulence and signal fluctuations in free-space optical communications systems lead to performance degradation, particularly due to deep fading, causing loss of data and reducing Quality of Service (QoS) due to the inability to handle varying signal strengths effectively.

Innovation Solution

An optical receiver system utilizing a level detector array with varying sensitivity levels and integration times, where each level detector operates within specific saturation and cutoff levels, allowing real-time analysis and dynamic adjustment of signal attenuation to mitigate fading effects and extend the dynamic range of the system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single photodetector is used to receive optical signals, then the device complexity is low, but the system cannot handle both strong and weak signals effectively due to saturation and noise issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal handling rangeVSAvoiddetector array complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the optical signal reception function into multiple segment detectors, each optimized for specific signal strength ranges. The optical signal is split into multiple paths with different attenuation levels, and each detector processes signals within its optimal dynamic range, preventing saturation and improving weak signal detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a single-detector approach to a multi-detector array with varying sensitivity levels. By introducing the dimension of detector sensitivity variation and signal path attenuation levels, the system can simultaneously handle both strong and weak optical signals that would otherwise be incompatible with a single detector's dynamic range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If the integration time is increased to detect weak signals, then the sensitivity to weak signals improves, but the response time to signal changes decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweak signal detection sensitivityVSAvoidresponse time to signal changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

Different detectors in the array are configured with different integration times tailored to their specific signal strength ranges. Detectors handling weak signals use longer integration times for enhanced sensitivity, while detectors handling strong signals use shorter integration times for faster response. This localized optimization resolves the trade-off between sensitivity and response speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects which detector's output to use based on current signal conditions. The controller monitors signal strength and automatically switches between detectors with different integration times, allowing the system to adapt its response characteristics in real-time according to the prevailing signal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If the system operates at high gain to detect weak signals, then the weak signal detection capability improves, but strong signals cause saturation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweak signal detection capabilityVSAvoidsignal saturation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the signal processing paths with different attenuation levels before detection. Weak signals are routed through paths with minimal or no attenuation to maintain detection sensitivity, while strong signals are routed through paths with higher attenuation to prevent detector saturation. This segmentation allows simultaneous optimization for both weak and strong signal handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Variable optical attenuators serve as intermediaries between the optical signal source and the photodetectors. These attenuators dynamically adjust the signal level entering each detector based on current signal conditions, preventing saturation while maintaining the ability to detect weak signals. The controller acts as an intermediary that coordinates the attenuator settings across multiple signal paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves high fidelity optical communications over a large dynamic range by dynamically adjusting sensitivity to handle both strong and weak signals, reducing data loss and maintaining QoS by selecting the appropriate operating range for each level detector based on detected signal levels.

Implementation Method 1

A photodetector array having a plurality of level detectors to monitor an optical input signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10236995B2Optical receiver sensitivity system
Publication Date: 2019.03.19 NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP
  • US10236995B2 patent drawing
  • US10236995B2 patent drawing
  • US10236995B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a detector array having a plurality of level detectors to monitor an optical input signal. Each level detector of the detector array operates in a different operating range, and each operating range for each level detector has a different saturation level and a different cutoff level based on a power level of the optical input signal. A controller monitors the plurality of level detectors of the detector array to detect a present power level for the optical input signal by selecting the operating range that is associated with the level detector operating between its saturation level and its cutoff level.