Optical Reflectance Calibration for Nonlinear Detector Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current optical detection systems inaccurately measure optical reflectance due to non-linear relationships between target reflectance and detector output signals, caused by multiple light paths within the chassis, leading to overestimation and underestimation of reflectance, especially for high reflectance targets, and lack flexibility in varying target distances.

Innovation Solution

A method to calibrate optical detection systems by determining a calibration factor M and height scaling factor η(z) to correct for non-linearities, using equations R = M ⋅ R R (S S - S H ) / (M ⋅ (S R - S H ) ⋅ η(z)) and R(λ) = M(λ) ⋅ R R (S S (λ) - S H (λ)) / (M(λ) ⋅ (S R (λ) - S H (λ)) ⋅ η(z)) to linearize the system response and account for varying target heights.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a linear relationship is assumed between target reflectance and detector output signal, then the system is simple to operate, but measurement precision deteriorates due to non-linear effects from multiple light paths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of reflectance calculationVSAvoidaccuracy of reflectance measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing calibration measurements before actual reflectance measurements. The system pre-determines calibration factors (M and η(z)) by measuring signals from targets with known reflectance values. This preliminary calibration step stores correction data that compensates for non-linear effects, allowing accurate reflectance calculations during actual measurements without requiring complex real-time computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If the system is calibrated for a specific target distance, then measurement precision is improved for that distance, but adaptability deteriorates when target distance varies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy at specific distanceVSAvoidflexibility with varying target distances
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing a height scaling factor η(z) that depends on the target distance z. The calibration factor M is determined as a function of height M(z), allowing the system to adapt to different target distances. During operation, the system measures or estimates the target distance and selects or interpolates the appropriate calibration parameters, enabling accurate reflectance measurements across a range of distances rather than being limited to a single fixed distance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If multiple light paths in the chassis are not accounted for, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates due to overestimation of detected intensity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical path modeling complexityVSAvoidreflectance measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses an intermediary approach by introducing calibration factors M and η(z) that mediate between the complex non-linear optical interactions and the simple reflectance calculation. Instead of directly modeling multiple light paths, the system uses calibration measurements with known reflectance targets to determine correction factors. These intermediary calibration factors encapsulate the effects of multiple reflections and geometric dependencies, allowing accurate measurements without requiring detailed optical path modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method provides accurate and flexible optical reflectance measurements by compensating for non-linearities and varying target distances, ensuring consistent results across different devices and heights, enhancing measurement precision and reducing device-to-device dispersion.

Implementation Method 1

detecting light reflected from the target using the light detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

the light detector provides an electrical output signal S S indicative of the intensity of the detected light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP4007907B1Optical detection system calibration
Publication Date: 2025.09.17 AMS OSRAM ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD
  • EP4007907B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4007907B1 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP4007907B1 patent drawingFigure 2b~3

AI summary

According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of measuring the optical reflectance R of a target using a detection system comprising a light emitter and a light detector spaced apart from one another. The method comprises illuminating the target with the light emitter, detecting light reflected from the target using the light detector, wherein the light detector provides an electrical output signal S S indicative of the intensity of the detected light, and determining the optical reflectance R of the target according to (Formula 1), where RR is the spectral reflectance of a reference standard, SR is the detector electrical output signal with the reference standard in place, SH is the detector electrical output signal with no target in front of the light emitter and light detector, and M is a calibration factor.