Optical Sensor Segment Testing with Gradient Light

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for testing optical sensors in surveillance areas fail to reliably detect both 'stuck-at' errors and coupling errors, which are critical for ensuring the accuracy of security applications like automatic doors.

Innovation Solution

The method involves irradiating spatially adjacent detector segments with test light of varying intensities to differentiate their reactions, allowing for individual and comparative evaluation of the intensities detected by the control and evaluation unit, enabling reliable detection of both 'stuck-at' and coupling errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If uniform test light intensity is applied to all detector segments, then the testing process is simple, but coupling errors cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of testing processVSAvoiddetection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different test light intensities to different spatial positions of detector segments. Specifically, detector segments are irradiated with test light intensities that increase or decrease monotonically along a line of detector segments, creating a spatial gradient. This local differentiation allows the system to detect coupling errors by comparing adjacent segments' responses, while maintaining a relatively simple test implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If detector segments are tested individually without comparative evaluation, then the testing process is straightforward, but coupling errors between adjacent segments remain undetected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of evaluation processVSAvoiderror detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a comparative evaluation process where the control and evaluation unit compares the reactions of adjacent detector segments to the test light irradiation. By evaluating detector segment responses in comparison to their neighbors and identifying deviations from the expected monotonic intensity pattern, the system detects coupling errors. This feedback mechanism enhances detection precision while building upon a straightforward individual testing foundation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the reliable detection of both 'stuck-at' and coupling errors, ensuring the operational safety of security applications by bringing the connected device into a safe state when errors are detected, and is simple and cost-effective to implement.

Implementation Method 1

a test unit (70) connected to the control and evaluation unit (50) for testing the detector segments, the test unit having a test light source (60) for irradiating the detector segments with test light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight emission from test light source: Light Emitting Diode

Implementation Method 2

a receiving unit (40) for detecting light reflected back from the monitored area. In this case, the receiving unit has at least one detector (30) with a plurality of detector segments (41, ..., 49)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP2199999B1Method for testing an optical sensor and testable optical sensor
Publication Date: 2012.05.02 PEPPERL & FUCHS GMBH
  • EP2199999B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2199999B1 patent drawing
  • EP2199999B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The method involves testing individual detector segments (41-49) by radiating test light (61, 65, 69) from an infra red LED to the detector segments. The test lights are differently selected in a sufficient manner for measuring technical differentiation of reactions of the spatially adjacent detector segments (41, 42), during normal function of the detector segments. Reaction of the individual detector segments to the radiation of the test light is evaluated individually or in comparison with reactions of the adjacent segments. An error signal is delivered in dependent of the evaluation. An independent claim is also included for a sensor with a reflector.