Optical Stack for Directional Display Privacy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing display technologies face challenges in providing effective privacy by reducing off-axis visibility while maintaining on-axis luminance, particularly due to high losses in head-on illumination and the occurrence of Moiré artefacts, and require complex configurations that increase inventory and cost.

Innovation Solution

A display device comprising a spatial light modulator, display polarizers, and passive retarders with specific orientations and configurations to reduce off-axis luminance, including crossed retarders and retarders with slow axes at 45° and 135°, 0°, and 90°, which are integrated with a directional waveguide and polarizers to control light distribution and minimize stray light.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If micro-louvre optical films are used to provide privacy function, then off-axis visibility is reduced, but head-on illumination losses are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoff-axis visibilityVSAvoidhead-on illumination losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The optical system is segmented into multiple functional layers: a first optical stack with polarizers and retarders for privacy control, and a second optical stack with additional polarizers and retarders for stray light reduction. Each layer performs a specific function, allowing independent optimization of privacy and illumination efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs multiple passive retarders with different orientations (0°, 45°, 90°, 135° slow axes) to modify the optical parameters of light propagation. By changing the orientation parameters of retarder layers, the system achieves directional control of light transmission, maintaining high on-axis luminance while reducing off-axis visibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If micro-louvre films are used for privacy, then off-axis visibility is reduced, but Moiré artefacts occur due to beating with pixels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoff-axis visibilityVSAvoidMoiré artefacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical micro-louvre structure with an optical system based on polarizers and passive retarders. This substitution eliminates the physical grating structure that causes Moiré effects while maintaining the privacy function through polarization-based directional control of light transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If pitch of micro-louvre is selected for panel resolution, then privacy function is optimized, but inventory and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel resolution matchingVSAvoidinventory and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optical stack design is universal and can be applied to different panel resolutions without requiring custom pitch optimization. The polarizer-retarder combination provides privacy control that is independent of pixel pitch, allowing the same optical components to be used across multiple product lines, thereby reducing inventory complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Illumination intensity

If additional polarizers and passive retarders are added, then off-axis luminance is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoff-axis luminanceVSAvoidoptical stack configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple optical functions into integrated stacks: the first optical stack merges privacy control functions (polarizer + retarder), and the second optical stack merges stray light reduction functions (additional polarizer + additional retarder). This merging approach achieves complex optical control while maintaining a structured, modular architecture that simplifies manufacturing and assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces off-axis visibility and stray light, maintaining high on-axis luminance, and allows for flexible operation in landscape and portrait modes without requiring matching to panel pixel resolution, thus enhancing privacy and reducing costs.

Implementation Method 1

at least one passive retarder arranged between the additional polariser and the display polariser

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBirefringence: Birefringence

Implementation Method 2

The display polariser may have an electric vector transmission direction that is parallel to the electric vector transmission direction of the additional polariser

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolarisation: Polarisation

Data Source

PatentUS11327358B2Optical stack for directional display
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 REALD SPARK LLC
  • US11327358B2 patent drawing
  • US11327358B2 patent drawing
  • US11327358B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A privacy display comprises a spatial light modulator and a passive retarder arranged between first and second polarisers arranged in series with the spatial light modulator. On-axis light from the spatial light modulator is directed without loss, and off-axis light has reduced luminance. The visibility of the display to off-axis snoopers is reduced by means of luminance reduction over a wide polar field of view. Off-axis visibility of the display in an automotive vehicle can be reduced.