Two-Stage Optical Switch Fabric for HPC Scalability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing optical switch fabrics for Terabit Ethernet (TE) based High-Performance Computing Networks (HPCNs) face challenges such as limited scalability, high power loss, and increased costs due to the need for optical amplifiers and custom-made AWGs, as well as inefficiencies under unbalanced traffic loads.

Innovation Solution

The proposed optical switch fabrics, named AS and SA, utilize a two-stage architecture with K N×N AWGs and N K×K OSSes, operating in a TDM mode without the need for electronic schedulers or wavelength converters. This design reduces signal power loss, eliminates the requirement for optical amplifiers, and allows for the use of commercially available AWGs, enhancing scalability and cost-effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a three-stage ASA switch fabric is used to extend port count, then scalability is improved, but signal power loss increases and optical amplifiers are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveport count scalabilityVSAvoidsignal power loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The switch fabric is divided into multiple stages with AWGs at the edges and OSSes in the middle. This segmentation allows light to pass through fewer components (only one AWG and one OSS) compared to the three-stage ASA architecture, reducing cumulative signal loss while maintaining scalability to support thousands of ports.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from the conventional three-stage ASA architecture to a two-stage architecture that reorganizes the switching paths. By changing the dimensional arrangement of switching stages and using TDM mode in OSSes, the system achieves better signal loss characteristics while maintaining the required port scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If custom-made AWGs are used to meet specific port count requirements, then scalability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveport count flexibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses commercially available AWGs with standard port counts (e.g., 8x8, 16x16) in combination with TDM-mode OSSes to achieve scalable port counts. The OSSes act as universal intermediaries that can work with any standard AWG configuration, eliminating the need for custom-made AWGs while maintaining flexibility to support thousands of ports through modular deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If electronic schedulers are used to control OSS configuration, then switching control is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching control capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The OSSes operate autonomously in TDM mode with pre-configured connection patterns stored in their memories. The system self-organizes the switching fabric without requiring external electronic schedulers to configure each OSS. This self-service approach simplifies the control architecture while maintaining full switching control capability through the inherent TDM switching mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of energy

If optical amplifiers are added to compensate for signal loss, then signal power is improved, but system cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal power levelVSAvoidsystem component count
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the need for optical amplifiers by redesigning the switch fabric architecture to minimize signal loss pathways. By reducing the number of components light must pass through and optimizing the two-stage configuration, the system achieves acceptable signal power levels without requiring additional optical amplifiers, thereby simplifying the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The AS and SA switch fabrics achieve low signal power loss, support thousands of TE links, and reduce implementation costs by eliminating the need for optical amplifiers and custom-made AWGs, while maintaining high scalability and efficiency even under unbalanced traffic loads.

Implementation Method 1

An N×N (N inputs and N outputs) AWG (also known as AWGR) is an ideal device for this task. It is a passive device consuming little or no power. Each input of the device can transmit N different wavelengths simultaneously, which are routed to N outputs without blocking.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffraction: Diffraction

Implementation Method 2

An N×N (N inputs and N outputs) AWG (also known as AWGR) is an ideal device for this task. It is a passive device consuming little or no power. Each input of the device can transmit N different wavelengths simultaneously, which are routed to N outputs without blocking.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference: Interference

Implementation Method 3

Optical switch fabrics for high performance computing that can switch WDM (Wavelength Division Multiplexed) packets simultaneously without the need for wavelength converters or optical amplifiers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWaveguide (optics): Waveguide (optics)

Data Source

PatentUS20250142235A1Optical switch fabrics for high performance computing
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 LEA CHIN TAU
  • US20250142235A1 patent drawing
  • US20250142235A1 patent drawing
  • US20250142235A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention is related to two-stage optical packet switch fabrics for TE (terabit Ethernet)-based HPCNs (high performance computing networks). The main features of the invented optical switch architecture are the following: (1) it can support thousands of TE links; (2) it has a low signal power loss and requires no optical amplifiers; (3) it can switch WDM packets simultaneously without using wavelength converters.The patent application presents various embodiments of the two-stage switch architecture. In one embodiment, the first stage comprises K N×N (N inputs and N outputs) AWGs and the second stage comprises N K×K OSSes (optical space switches). This results in a port count of KN. Each input can transmit N wavelengths and a total of KN2 packets can pass through the switch fabric simultaneously without blocking. The switch fabric is named AS for the technologies used in the two stages. Currently 32×32 AWGs are available. This allows an AS switch fabric to support more than a couple of thousands TE links easily.In another embodiment, the first stage comprises N K×K OSSes and the second stage comprises K N×N AWGs. It is named SA for the same reason given above. Similar to the first embodiment, the total number of source and destination ports supported by an SA switch fabric equals KN, and KN2 packets can be transmitted simultaneously through the switch fabric. All the features and advantages of the AS architecture are inherited by the SA architecture.In still another embodiment, two AS or SA switch fabrics are used in parallel to construct a switching system capable of handling any kind of unbalanced traffic loads. A port processor for keeping a bounded delay, for processing and re-sequencing packets in such a switching system is also presented in this patent application.