Processing Node Control with Optical Switching for Flexible Paths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing switching networks in processing systems have poor flexibility due to fixed physical links between electrical switching nodes, limiting communication paths and increasing the probability of data exchange failures between processing nodes.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating optical switching nodes and a control node into the processing system, allowing for flexible adjustment of port mapping relationships to dynamically reconfigure the connection between electrical switching nodes, thereby enhancing network flexibility and reducing data exchange failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If fixed physical links are used between electrical switching nodes, then the network structure is simple and stable, but the flexibility of the switching network deteriorates and communication paths are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork structure stabilityVSAvoidswitching network flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces optical switching nodes that can dynamically reconfigure connection relationships between electrical switching nodes through flexible port mapping. The optical switching node changes its connection state based on communication requirements, transforming the static network into a dynamic one that can adapt to different communication scenarios while maintaining structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The optical switching node acts as an intermediary between electrical switching nodes, providing flexible port mapping capabilities. This intermediary component enables dynamic routing and communication path selection without requiring changes to the underlying electrical switching node structure, thus resolving the contradiction between structural stability and operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If fixed physical links are used between electrical switching nodes, then the device complexity is reduced, but the number of available communication paths deteriorates and data exchange failure probability increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching network complexityVSAvoiddata exchange reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The optical switching node introduces dynamic port mapping that can create multiple communication paths on demand. When data exchange failures occur or are predicted, the system can dynamically reroute traffic through alternative paths without increasing the physical complexity of the network infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the mapping parameters of the optical switching node to dynamically adjust communication paths. By modifying port mapping relationships rather than physical connections, the system increases reliability through multiple routing options while maintaining simple device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If flexible port mapping is implemented in optical switching nodes, then the switching network flexibility is improved, but the control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching network flexibilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optical switching node is designed to automatically perform port mapping operations based on received control instructions. The node autonomously configures its internal connections without requiring complex external control systems, reducing overall control complexity while maintaining high flexibility in communication path establishment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements control mechanisms where the optical switching node receives status information and control instructions from the control node, executes port mapping adjustments, and reports back on connection status. This feedback loop enables flexible adaptability through standardized control protocols rather than complex distributed control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250227053A1Node Control Method and Apparatus, and Processing System
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US20250227053A1 patent drawing
  • US20250227053A1 patent drawing
  • US20250227053A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A node control method includes: A control node in the processing system deploys a target path group when R target processing nodes include at least one first node group, and controls the R target processing nodes to process R tasks in one-to-one correspondence. The first node group includes two target processing nodes that need to communicate with each other when executing corresponding tasks and that are connected to different first electrical switching nodes. The target path group includes a communication path between target processing nodes in the first node group, and the communication path passes through the first electrical switching node, an optical switching node, and a second electrical switching node.