Optical Telescope Network for LEO Object Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current monitoring systems for low Earth orbit (LEO) objects face challenges in rapid detection, frequent re-acquisition, and maintaining accurate orbital parameters due to limitations in sensitivity, resolution, and field of view, as well as being incompatible with the dynamic and variable conditions in LEO, such as fragmentation, explosion phenomena, and collision risk assessment.

Innovation Solution

A ground-based optical monitoring system using distributed passive optical solutions with a network of telescopes, optimized for wide field coverage and high sensitivity, employing short integration times and advanced image processing to detect and track objects in LEO, providing precise orbital parameter determination and tracking capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If ground-based radars are used for LEO monitoring, then detection sensitivity and field of view are improved, but development, operation and maintenance costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces radar systems (electromagnetic radiation-based) with optical telescopes (light-based) for LEO object detection. This substitution maintains detection capability while eliminating the high power consumption, magnetic losses, and maintenance costs associated with radar systems, achieving comparable performance at lower operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the LEO monitoring task into multiple distributed optical telescopes positioned at different geographic locations. Each telescope covers a specific orbital inclination range, and the network collectively provides global coverage. This segmentation allows cost-effective monitoring by assigning specialized telescopes to specific orbital zones rather than requiring one comprehensive high-cost system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If optical systems with long integration times are used, then detection sensitivity for GEO/MEO objects is improved, but tracking capability for rapidly moving LEO objects deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidtracking speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic exposure time adjustment based on object orbital characteristics. For LEO objects with high apparent motion, the system uses short exposure times (milliseconds to seconds) to prevent trailing and maintain detection accuracy. For GEO/MEO objects with slower motion, longer integration times are employed to maximize sensitivity. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between sensitivity and tracking speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs frequent, periodic observations of LEO objects using short exposure times. Rather than single long exposures, the system captures multiple rapid successive images, allowing detection of rapidly moving objects while building up signal through repeated measurements. This periodic sampling approach maintains both sensitivity and accurate speed measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Device complexity

If a single optical system is used for LEO monitoring, then system simplicity is maintained, but coverage completeness and revisit frequency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem configurationVSAvoidcoverage completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the LEO monitoring function across multiple distributed optical telescopes, each optimized for specific orbital inclination ranges. This geographic and functional segmentation ensures complete coverage of all possible LEO trajectories while maintaining relatively simple individual telescope designs. The network architecture provides redundancy and frequent revisit capability that a single system cannot achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a multi-functional network where each optical telescope can observe multiple orbital inclinations and object types (debris, operational satellites, meteorites). The distributed network collectively provides universal coverage of the entire LEO environment, with each node contributing to the overall comprehensive monitoring capability through coordinated observations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If radar systems are positioned in equatorial zones for optimal LEO coverage, then detection capability is improved, but operational reliability deteriorates due to severe temperature and humidity conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidoperational reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces radar systems with optical telescopes, eliminating the need for high-power electrical equipment that is sensitive to temperature and humidity. Optical systems have no magnetic losses, lower power requirements, and greater environmental tolerance, allowing deployment in more favorable locations while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent positions optical telescopes at specific latitudes optimized for observing particular orbital inclination ranges (e.g., high-latitude telescopes for polar orbits, equatorial telescopes for equatorial orbits). This local optimization allows each telescope to operate in environmentally favorable conditions while collectively providing global LEO coverage, avoiding the need to place all systems in harsh equatorial zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves competitive cost-effectiveness with radar solutions, offering complete coverage of LEO objects, high detection and revisit rates, and precise orbital parameter maintenance, enabling effective collision risk assessment and avoidance maneuvers.

Implementation Method 1

Their principle lies in the detection of solar light reflected by natural or artificial objects orbiting the Earth or beyond

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP2593366B1Optical watch system for a space watch system for near space monitoring
Publication Date: 2023.08.30 ARIANEGRP SAS
  • EP2593366B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2593366B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2593366B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to an optical system for a watch system for a space watch system, characterized in that said optical system comprises at least one telescope having a field no lower than 5°, and preferably no lower than 10°, which is mounted on a mount that is movable along two axes, wherein said telescope is coupled to an image sensor having a sensitivity suitable for an integration time having an order of magnitude of a hundred milliseconds.