Optical Test Features for Secure Cover Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for communicating secrets, such as user secrets, passwords, and PINs, via written messages with removable covers do not ensure 100% coverage, leading to security risks if the cover is applied partially or not at all, allowing third parties to potentially access the secrets.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating optically interrogable test features within the message field, which are detectable using CCD or OCR devices, ensuring complete coverage by protruding from the cover and allowing for automated detection, even if the cover is not properly applied, using features like barcodes, color, or geometric properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual visual inspection of the cover is used, then coverage can be checked, but processing speed is slow and productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover coverage detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection with automated optical detection systems (CCD cameras, OCR devices, barcode scanners) that can rapidly detect test features and determine cover coverage status, thereby maintaining high detection accuracy while dramatically increasing processing speed and eliminating the bottleneck of manual inspection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses optical copies (images captured by CCD cameras) of the test features and secrets to enable automated analysis. The detection system captures images and processes them through software algorithms to determine coverage status, replacing the need for human visual inspection while maintaining detection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If test features are placed only inside the cover field, then coverage can be detected, but the detection reliability is reduced when covers are partially applied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage detection reliabilityVSAvoidtest feature arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the test feature into multiple segments or uses multiple separate test features positioned at different locations (corners, edges, center) of the cover field. This segmentation ensures that at least some test feature portions remain visible even when covers are partially applied, thereby maintaining detection reliability without requiring a single complex test feature arrangement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent places test features not only within the cover field but also partially outside the field boundaries. This excessive positioning ensures that test features protrude from improperly applied covers, making detection errors more apparent and improving reliability by creating a buffer zone that compensates for misalignment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If secrets are made detectable by the same method as test features, then detection is simplified, but security is compromised as secrets could be read without proper cover removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection process simplicityVSAvoidsecurity risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent assigns different detectable properties to test features versus secrets. Test features use properties optimized for rapid automated detection (barcodes, geometric patterns, specific colors), while secrets use properties optimized for human readability (alphanumeric characters, standard fonts). This local differentiation allows automated systems to quickly verify test features without being able to interpret the secret content, maintaining security while simplifying the detection process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces test features as intermediary elements that serve as proxies for verifying cover coverage. Instead of directly detecting secrets (which would compromise security), the system detects test features that indicate whether the cover is properly applied. The test features act as a safe intermediary that provides coverage verification information without exposing sensitive secret content to automated detection systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures 100% coverage of secrets, reducing security risks by enabling immediate detection of partial or absent coverage, eliminating the need for manual visual inspection and allowing for faster processing and recognition.

Implementation Method 1

the optically interrogable test feature is different is formed into the secret and can be detected with a detection method by which the secret cannot be detected. This makes it possible for cheaper and more reliable optical checks to be used, especially since the secret is preferably queried using a CCD or an OCR checking device.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection:

Data Source

PatentEP2744667B1Text letter and method of checking same
Publication Date: 2015.04.01 BUNDESDRUCKEREI GMBH
  • EP2744667B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3b
  • EP2744667B1 patent drawingFigure 4~7

AI summary

The invention relates to a written message (11) for transmitting at least one secret (14) to a user, the written message comprising at least one carrier medium (15) having information (13) applied thereto and a removable covering (12), which covers the secret (14) in order to ensure 100% covering (12) of the secret (14), and to a method for examining the covering (12) properly applied to the written message (11) for completely concealing the secret (14).