Optical Tool Length Measurement for Small-Diameter Beam Occlusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Non-contact tool setting apparatuses face measurement inaccuracies when measuring tools with diameters less than the beam width, as they only partially occlude the light beam, leading to errors in tool length determination and requiring complex, expensive optical designs to maintain focus.

Innovation Solution

A method for tool length measurement using a non-contact tool setting apparatus that involves moving the tool through the light beam, generating a trigger signal when the beam intensity crosses a threshold, and applying a tool length correction to account for the nominal tool diameter being less than the beam width, allowing for accurate measurements with wider, less tightly focused light beams.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the beam width is reduced to ensure tools can substantially occlude the beam, then measurement accuracy is improved, but device complexity and cost increase due to complicated optical designs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool length measurement accuracyVSAvoidoptical design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of beam width from narrow to wide, and introduces a correction factor based on tool diameter to beam width ratio. This allows using simpler, wider beams while maintaining measurement accuracy through mathematical correction rather than relying on tight optical focusing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/optical approach of tight beam focusing with a computational approach using correction factors. Instead of using complex optical elements to narrow the beam, the system uses a wider beam and applies mathematical corrections to compensate for the partial occlusion effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If the beam is tightly focussed to improve measurement accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to sensitivity to contamination and misalignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool length measurement accuracyVSAvoidoperational reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the beam width parameter from narrow (tightly focused) to wide (gently focused or collimated), which inherently improves reliability by reducing sensitivity to contamination and misalignment while maintaining measurement accuracy through the introduction of diameter-based correction factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If a fixed trigger threshold is used for beam occlusion detection, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates for tools with diameter less than beam width

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrigger signal generation simplicityVSAvoidtool length measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic adjustment of the trigger threshold based on the measured tool diameter. The trigger threshold is no longer fixed but varies according to the ratio of tool diameter to beam width, allowing accurate measurements across different tool sizes while maintaining ease of operation through automated adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the trigger threshold from a fixed parameter to a dynamic parameter that depends on tool diameter and beam width ratio. This allows the system to adapt to different tool sizes and maintain measurement precision without requiring manual recalibration or complex optical adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables accurate tool length measurements for tools with diameters less than the beam width, reducing the need for complex optics and improving measurement reliability, while allowing the use of collimated or gently focused light beams, which are easier to maintain and less prone to contamination.

Implementation Method 1

a transmitter for emitting a light beam having a beam width and a receiver for receiving the light beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight propagation: Light

Implementation Method 2

the tool being moved by the machine tool into or out of the light beam in a direction along the length of the tool... causing a change in the beam intensity signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight occlusion/absorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentEP3678816B1Non-contact optical tool length measuring apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2024.03.06 RENISHAW PLC
  • EP3678816B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3678816B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3c
  • EP3678816B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A method for tool measurement using a non-contact tool setting apparatus mounted to a machine tool. The non-contact tool setting apparatus comprises a transmitter (10) for emitting a light beam (12;80) having a beam width and a receiver(14)for receiving the light beam(12). The receiver (14) generates a beam intensity signal describing the intensity of received light. The method is for measuring a tool (84) having a nominal tool diameter less than the beam width such that fully inserting the tool(84)feature into the light beam (80) would only partially occlude the light beam(80). The method comprises moving the tool through the light beam (12;80) thereby causing a change in the beam intensity signal and generating a trigger signal when the beam intensity signal crosses a trigger threshold. A size of the tool(84) is derived using the trigger signal generated. The method also comprises a step of applying a tool length correction (e.g. a change to the trigger threshold, trigger delay etc) that accounts for the nominal tool diameter of the tool (84)being less than the beam width.