Optical Transceiver Pluggable Mechanism With Composite Slider

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pluggable optical transceivers have mono-functional arrangements of bail and pull-tab, making mutual replacement complex and troublesome, limiting flexibility in changing between these mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

The optical transceiver features a slider with a composite opening that can accommodate both bail and pull-tab, allowing for easy assembly and disassembly by engaging hooks with curved and square openings, enabling simple exchange between the two mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a mono-functional arrangement of bail and pull-tab is used, then the structure is simple, but mutual replacement between bail and pull-tab is complex and troublesome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of structureVSAvoidmutual replacement capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The slider is designed with a composite opening that can accommodate both the bail and the pull-tab, allowing the same slider component to serve multiple functions. The composite opening includes both a curved opening for the bail and a square opening for the pull-tab, enabling mutual replacement without requiring different slider designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The composite opening is segmented into distinct curved and square openings, each designed for a specific mechanism (bail or pull-tab). This segmentation allows independent installation and removal of each mechanism while maintaining a unified slider structure, simplifying the replacement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a composite opening with both curved and square openings is provided in the slider, then mutual replacement between bail and pull-tab is simplified, but the slider structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemutual replacement capabilityVSAvoidslider structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The curved opening and square opening are merged into a single composite opening structure on the slider. This integration allows both the bail and pull-tab to be mounted on the same slider without requiring separate sliders or complex mounting mechanisms, reducing overall system complexity despite the multi-functional capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If hooks are used to engage with curved and square openings, then assembly and disassembly is simplified, but the engagement mechanism requires precise geometric matching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly and disassembly simplicityVSAvoidgeometric matching precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The slider provides different local geometries (curved opening and square opening) optimized for specific engagement types. The curved opening is designed for rotational engagement with the bail hook, while the square opening is designed for linear engagement with the pull-tab hook, allowing each mechanism to engage in its optimal manner.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10191229B2Pluggable mechanism of optical transceiver
Publication Date: 2019.01.29 SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US10191229B2 patent drawing
  • US10191229B2 patent drawing
  • US10191229B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optical transceiver that optionally exchanges between the bail and the pull-tab for disengaging the optical transceiver with the cage is disclosed. The optical transceiver provides a slider to be assembled with both of the bail and the pull-tab. The slider provides an opening common to the bail and the pull-tab, and a composite opening that includes a portion for the bail and another portion for the pull-tab. The bail, by rotating around the common opening, may induce forward and rearward motions for the slider, while, the pull-tab, by pulling and pushing, may directly cause the forward and rearward motions for the slider through the composite opening.