Optical Transceiver Tuning via Machine Learning Waveform Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current optical transceiver tuning process is time-intensive and costly, requiring up to two hours and numerous iterations to achieve desired performance, as manufacturers rely on manual parameter sweeping without the aid of machine learning.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a machine learning system within the test and measurement device to train and adjust optical transceiver parameters more efficiently, using historical data to provide accurate starting points and optimize tuning parameters based on waveform analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual parameter sweeping is used to tune optical transceivers, then the transceiver can be tuned to desired performance, but the tuning process takes up to two hours and requires numerous iterations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning accuracyVSAvoidtuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual parameter sweeping (mechanical/systematic trial-and-error approach) with a machine learning-based tuning system. The ML model predicts optimal tuning parameters directly, eliminating the need for iterative parameter sweeping and reducing tuning time from hours to minutes while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary training by collecting training data from initial parameter sweeps and waveforms, then uses this pre-trained model to predict optimal parameters for new transceivers. This preliminary action creates a knowledge base that accelerates subsequent tuning operations without requiring full parameter sweeps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional parameter sweeping methods are used, then tuning can be accomplished, but the manufacturing expense increases due to time consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive iterative parameter sweeping with a machine learning model that predicts optimal parameters. The ML system maintains tuning reliability by learning from training data while dramatically reducing the time and associated manufacturing costs of the tuning process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If machine learning is implemented to reduce tuning iterations, then tuning speed increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning throughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a machine learning model as an intermediary between the transceiver and the tuning process. The ML model acts as a mediator that predicts optimal parameters based on training data, simplifying the overall system by replacing complex iterative tuning algorithms with a trained prediction model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of time

If fewer tuning iterations are performed, then manufacturing time decreases, but measurement precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning cycle timeVSAvoidwaveform measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary training by collecting comprehensive waveform data and parameter information during the training phase. This preliminary action builds a robust model that can make accurate predictions with fewer iterations, effectively shifting the measurement precision requirements to the training phase rather than the production tuning phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11923896B2Optical transceiver tuning using machine learning
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 TEKTRONIX INC
  • US11923896B2 patent drawing
  • US11923896B2 patent drawing
  • US11923896B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A test and measurement device has a connection to allow the test and measurement device to connect to an optical transceiver, one or more processors, configured to execute code that causes the one or more processors to: initially set operating parameters for the optical transceiver to average parameters, acquire a waveform from the optical transceiver, measure the acquired waveform and determine if operation of the transceiver passes or fails, send the waveform and the operating parameters to a machine learning system to obtain estimated parameters if the transceiver fails, adjust the operating parameters based upon the estimated parameters, and repeat the acquiring, measuring, sending, and adjusting as needed until the transceiver passes. A method to tune optical transceivers includes connecting a transceiver to a test and measurement device, setting operating parameters for the transceiver to an average set of parameters, acquiring a waveform from the transceiver, measuring the waveform to determine if the transceiver passes or fails, sending the waveform and operating parameters to a machine learning system when the transceiver fails, using the machine learning system to provide adjusted operating parameters, setting the operating parameters to the adjusted parameters, and repeating the acquiring, measuring, sending, using, and setting until the transceiver passes.