Intelligence-Defined Optical Tunnel Network for Data Center Scalability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Data Center Networks using electrical switches face limitations in transmission rate, high power consumption due to frequent Optical-Electrical and Electrical-Optical conversions, and require frequent upgrades to support increasing racks and servers, leading to increased costs and latency.

Innovation Solution

An intelligence-defined optical tunnel network system comprising optical switch interconnect sub-systems and add-drop sub-systems with a failover module and micro-control unit, which selectively routes optical signals based on signal intensity to optimize data transmission and reduce power consumption, allowing for flexible deployment and scalability without hardware upgrades.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional electronic switches are used for data exchanging, then the network structure is simple and easy to implement, but the transmission rate is limited and power consumption is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission rateVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional electronic switches with optical switches that operate entirely in the optical domain. This substitution eliminates the need for Optical-Electrical-Optical conversions, thereby reducing power consumption while significantly increasing transmission rates. The optical switch uses optical signals directly without converting to electrical signals, addressing both the speed and energy consumption issues simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operating domain from electrical to optical by introducing optical switches. This parameter change fundamentally alters how data is transmitted and switched, enabling higher transmission rates and lower power consumption. The system transitions from electrical signal processing to optical signal processing, which inherently supports higher speeds and lower energy requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If conventional electronic switches perform computation to determine routing, then routing decisions can be made, but latency increases and power consumption rises

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidcomputation power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces computational routing decisions with optical signal-based routing. Instead of electronically computing and processing routing information, the system uses optical switches that can dynamically route optical signals based on pre-configured paths or simple optical control signals. This eliminates the computational overhead and associated latency and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the computational function from the switching process. Rather than having switches perform complex computation to determine routing, the routing logic is separated out, and switches simply execute predefined routing instructions or respond to simple control signals. This extraction of computation reduces latency and power consumption at the switch level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system structure of electronic switches is formed and fixed, then the system is stable, but it is difficult to upgrade to support more racks or servers

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a modular optical switching system where the network is divided into multiple optical switch units that can be independently configured and scaled. Each optical switch can handle specific racks or servers, and additional switches can be added to the network as needed. This segmentation allows flexible expansion without redesigning the entire system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic reconfigurability to the optical switching system. Optical switches can dynamically adjust their routing paths and connections based on current network requirements, allowing the system to adapt to changing demands for supporting more racks or servers. This dynamic capability enables scalability without fixed structural constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Speed

If electronic switches are replaced or upgraded to increase transmission rate, then the transmission rate improves, but the cost to establish or maintain the network increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission rateVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electronic switching infrastructure with optical switching infrastructure. This substitution achieves higher transmission rates inherently through optical signal processing without requiring frequent upgrades or replacements of electronic components. The optical system provides sustained high-speed performance, reducing long-term costs associated with upgrading electronic switches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3582508B1Intelligence-defined optical tunnel network system and network system control method
Publication Date: 2022.02.23 DELTA ELECTRONICS INC(CN)
  • EP3582508B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3582508B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3582508B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

An intelligence-defined optical tunnel network system includes multiple Optical Switch Interconnect Sub-systems (OSIS), in which a first OSIS is configured to transmit a first lateral transmission optical signal via a first line to a second OSIS, and transmit a second lateral transmission optical signal via a second line to the second OSIS. The second OSIS includes a failover sub-module and a micro-control unit. The failover sub-module is configured to output one of the first and the second lateral transmission optical signal based on a selective signal. The micro-control unit is configured to output the selective signal to the failover sub-module to control the failover sub-module output the second lateral transmission optical signal if a signal intensity of the first lateral transmission optical signal is lower than a threshold value.