Optimization Device Policy Adaptation Without Environment Knowledge

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing optimization techniques require knowledge of the objective function and environment structure, making it difficult to determine the appropriate policy in real-world scenarios, especially in adversarial settings where the objective function is not a specific probability distribution.

Innovation Solution

An optimization device and method that acquires rewards from executing policies, updates probability distributions using a weighted sum of past distributions as a constraint, and determines the next policy based on these updated distributions, eliminating the need to select algorithms based on the environment structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If existing optimization techniques are used, then optimization can be performed, but it requires knowledge of the objective function and environment structure which is not available in real-world scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to real-world scenariosVSAvoidlack of knowledge about objective function and environment structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization device performs self-service by automatically adapting to the environment through continuous updates of probability distributions based on observed rewards, eliminating the need for external provision of environmental knowledge or objective function specifications. The system serves itself by learning from actual outcomes and adjusting its policy selection accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the observed rewards from policy execution are fed back into the probability distribution updates. This feedback loop enables the device to continuously refine its understanding of the environment and adjust future policy selections without requiring prior knowledge of the objective function or environmental structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If algorithms are selected based on environment structure, then appropriate algorithm can be chosen, but it requires human judgment and knowledge which is not always available

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm selection accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of algorithm selection process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization device eliminates the need for human algorithm selection by performing self-service through automatic adaptation. It continuously updates probability distributions based on observed rewards and autonomously determines the optimal policy, replacing the complex human judgment process with an automated learning mechanism that requires no prior environmental analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If probability distribution is updated using weighted sum of past distributions as constraint, then adaptive determination of optimum policy is achieved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptive policy determinationVSAvoidcomputational complexity of probability distribution update
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by maintaining and updating probability distributions in advance based on past observations. These pre-computed distributions are then used as constraints for future policy determinations, avoiding the need for complex real-time computations while still achieving adaptive policy selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization device maintains continuous updates of probability distributions based on past rewards, creating an ongoing process that builds upon previous computations. This continuity allows the system to leverage historical computational results for current decisions, reducing the computational burden of each individual policy determination while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20240037177A1Optimization device, optimization method, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2024.02.01 NEC CORP
  • US20240037177A1 patent drawing
  • US20240037177A1 patent drawing
  • US20240037177A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In an optimization device, an acquisition means acquires a reward obtained by executing a certain policy. An updating means updates a probability distribution of the policy based on the obtained reward. Here, the updating means uses a weighted sum of the probability distributions updated in a past as a constraint. A determination means determines the policy to be executed, based on the updated probability distributions.