Optimization Model for Multidimensional User Strategy Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current strategy evaluation systems, particularly in fields like online-to-offline services and product development, face challenges in accurately determining optimal strategies due to limitations in A/B testing, which often rely on single dimensions and lack comprehensive user feedback analysis.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that classify users into groups based on multiple dimensions using an optimization model, obtaining behavior data, and determining parameter values to select an optimal strategy, incorporating a multidimensional approach and big data analysis to improve accuracy and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If A/B testing is used to evaluate strategy performances, then strategy evaluation can be conducted, but the accuracy is insufficient due to single dimension analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrategy evaluation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from single-dimension A/B testing to multi-dimensional user classification by incorporating additional attributes such as user demographics, behavior patterns, and contextual factors. This dimensional expansion enables more accurate strategy evaluation by analyzing user responses across multiple segments simultaneously, thereby improving measurement precision without prohibitively increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments users into distinct groups based on multiple dimensions including age, gender, location, and behavior characteristics. This segmentation allows for more granular analysis of strategy performance across different user subsets, improving the overall accuracy of strategy evaluation by capturing heterogeneous user responses that single-dimension testing would miss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If comprehensive user feedback analysis is implemented across multiple dimensions, then reliability of optimal strategy determination improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimal strategy determination reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates multiple dimensions of user feedback including demographic attributes, behavioral patterns, contextual information, and response metrics. By analyzing user responses across these multiple dimensions simultaneously, the system achieves more reliable optimal strategy determination that accounts for complex user heterogeneity, while using computational methods to manage the increased data processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified representations or models of complex user behavior patterns by aggregating multi-dimensional data into meaningful segments and profiles. These copied or modeled representations enable reliable strategy evaluation without requiring processing of every individual data point, thereby improving reliability while controlling system complexity through effective data abstraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10963830B2Systems and methods for determining an optimal strategy
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 BEIJING DIDI INFINITY TECH & DEV CO LTD
  • US10963830B2 patent drawing
  • US10963830B2 patent drawing
  • US10963830B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is related to systems and methods for determining an optimal strategy. The method includes classify one or more users into a first user group and a second user group using an optimization model, wherein the first user group and the second user group correspond to two strategies, respectively. The method also includes obtain behavior data from terminals of the one or more users in the first user group and the second user group. The method further includes determine a first value of a parameter regarding the first user group and a second value of the parameter regarding the second user group using the optimization model. The method further includes determine a strategy based on the first value and the second value.