Optimized mRNA for Genome Editing Reducing Immunogenicity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing genome editing approaches using RNA-guided DNA binding agents like CRISPR-Cas systems face inefficiencies and immunogenicity issues, leading to suboptimal cytokine responses upon administration.

Innovation Solution

Development of mRNA encoding RNA-guided DNA-binding agents with optimized codon usage, uridine content, and nucleotide composition to enhance editing efficiency and reduce immunogenicity, specifically targeting liver cells with improved translation efficiency and reduced cytokine elevation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing mRNA encoding RNA-guided DNA binding agents is used for genome editing, then genome editing function is achieved, but editing efficiency is insufficient and immunogenicity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenome editing efficiencyVSAvoidimmunogenicity and cytokine elevation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes multiple parameters of the mRNA molecule including codon usage (using codons preferred in human cells), uridine content (reducing to minimum necessary levels), nucleotide composition ratios, and structural features to simultaneously improve translation efficiency and reduce immunogenicity. This involves changing the chemical and sequence parameters of the mRNA to achieve better performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different optimization strategies to different regions of the mRNA molecule, such as optimizing the 5' UTR and 3' UTR regions separately from the coding sequence, and using different codon optimization approaches for different segments of the open reading frame to maximize translation efficiency while minimizing immune recognition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If codon usage and nucleotide composition are optimized to improve translation efficiency, then editing efficiency increases, but complexity of mRNA design increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation efficiency and editing efficiencyVSAvoidmRNA design and optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically optimizes multiple parameters including codon usage frequency, uridine content, adenine content, GC content, and nucleotide composition ratios. By establishing specific parameter ranges and optimization criteria, the complex design process is structured and manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary optimization of the mRNA sequence before synthesis, including codon optimization based on human cell preferences, adjustment of nucleotide composition, and design of optimized 5' and 3' UTR regions. This preliminary design work simplifies the overall development process by establishing optimized sequences before experimental validation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240076636A1Polynucleotides, Compositions, and Methods for Genome Editing
Publication Date: 2024.03.07 INTELLIA THERAPEUTICS INC
  • US20240076636A1 patent drawing
  • US20240076636A1 patent drawing
  • US20240076636A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Compositions and methods for gene editing. In some embodiments, a polynucleotide encoding Cas9 is provided that can provide one or more of improved editing efficiency, reduced immunogenicity, or other benefits.