Optimizer for Associative Memory Query Criteria

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face difficulties in formulating optimal queries for associative memories, especially when they are not subject matter experts, leading to sub-optimal comparisons and inefficiencies in data searches.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize an optimizer to generate a multi-dimensional criteria file from input criteria, converting them into numerical representations associated with expert weights, allowing for optimized attribute selection and comparison within associative memories, enabling non-experts to leverage expert knowledge for more relevant and accurate entity comparisons.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users formulate queries without subject matter expertise, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision of comparison criteria deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of query formulationVSAvoidprecision of comparison criteria
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an optimizer as an intermediary component that automatically generates optimal comparison criteria from user input. The optimizer acts as a mediator between the user's simple query input and the complex associative memory search requirements, translating user intent into precise multi-dimensional criteria without requiring users to have subject matter expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the optimizer to automatically generate optimized comparison criteria based on the input criteria and existing data in the associative memory. The system serves itself by learning from the data structures and relationships already present in the memory, eliminating the need for manual expert intervention in each query formulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If precise criteria are used for entity comparison, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of comparison criteriaVSAvoidcomplexity of query system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optimizer automatically generates precise comparison criteria by analyzing the input criteria and the data structures within the associative memory. The system self-services by deriving the necessary multi-dimensional criteria from the existing data relationships, eliminating the need for manual configuration of complex search parameters and reducing the perceived complexity for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the input criteria and data relationships before executing the search. The optimizer pre-processes the query requirements and generates the optimal comparison criteria in advance, so that when the search is executed, the complex precision requirements are already resolved and ready for efficient processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If multi-dimensional criteria are generated automatically, then productivity is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption of optimizer
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The optimizer dynamically adjusts the parameters of the comparison criteria based on the input and the data in the associative memory. By changing the dimensional parameters and weights of the criteria, the system can optimize search efficiency for different query types without requiring a complete reconfiguration, thereby improving productivity while managing computational energy consumption through adaptive parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8914604B2Creating optimal comparison criterion within associative memories
Publication Date: 2014.12.16 THE BOEING CO
  • US8914604B2 patent drawing
  • US8914604B2 patent drawing
  • US8914604B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system including an associative memory including a plurality of data and a plurality of associations among the plurality of data. The plurality of data is collected into associated groups. The associative memory is configured to be queried based on at least indirect relationships among the plurality of data. The system also includes an input device in communication with the associative memory, the input device configured to receive an input criteria. The system also includes an optimizer in communication with the input device and the associative memory. The optimizer is configured to generate, using the associative memory, a multi-dimensional criteria file from the input criteria. The optimizer converts the input criteria to numerical representations associated with expert weights and generates the multi-dimensional criteria file to include an optimized plurality of criteria relevant to the input criteria.