Option Strategy Display System for Automated Trading

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated trading systems are slow and prone to errors due to their reliance on general-purpose backend computers and lack of trading judgment, leading to potential losses from incomplete or mistaken assumptions and data issues.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for determining and presenting likely option strategies based on user inputs, allowing users to select an underlying asset, view available options, and automatically determine and display probable strategies and their prices, reducing the need for manual strategy creation and minimizing errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If automated trading systems use general-purpose backend computers to process trading information, then the system is easier to operate and more adaptable, but the response speed becomes slow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidresponse speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the automated trading architecture into specialized components: front-end trader stations for user interaction and a back-end option processing server for strategy calculation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, with the server handling complex option strategy computations efficiently while trader stations maintain user-friendly interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The option processing server acts as an intermediary between the exchange and trader stations. It receives real-time option data from the exchange, processes strategy calculations, and returns recommended strategies to traders. This intermediary layer enables rapid automated strategy generation without requiring traders to manually analyze complex option combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If automated trading systems rely on computer algorithms without human judgment, then response speed increases, but accuracy and reliability decrease due to incomplete assumptions and data errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidaccuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates multiple feedback mechanisms including real-time option price data from the exchange, risk parameter calculations (delta, gamma, theta, vega), and performance tracking of recommended strategies. This feedback loop allows the automated system to continuously adjust and validate its assumptions, improving reliability while maintaining speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The option processing server pre-calculates and stores option strategy templates and risk parameters before trading occurs. When real-time option data arrives, the system quickly matches current prices against pre-computed strategies, enabling rapid response without sacrificing accuracy through thorough preliminary analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If traders manually analyze trading information and create strategies, then accuracy and judgment are improved, but time consumption and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The option processing server automatically generates recommended option strategies by self-service processing of real-time option data. It independently calculates risk parameters, evaluates strategy profitability, and presents recommendations to traders without requiring manual analysis, thereby maintaining accuracy while dramatically improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified copies of complex option strategy calculations by using standardized risk parameter models (delta, gamma, theta, vega) and pre-computed strategy templates. These copies enable rapid automated strategy generation that mirrors the analytical depth of manual expert analysis without the time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Loss of information

If the system displays all possible option strategies, then completeness of information is improved, but device complexity and ease of operation worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of informationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by displaying only the most relevant option strategies to traders based on their selected parameters and risk profiles. Rather than overwhelming traders with all possible strategies, the option processing server filters and prioritizes recommendations, presenting a manageable subset that maintains informational completeness for decision-making while reducing interface complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9846908B2Smart complete option strategy display
Publication Date: 2017.12.19 OPTIONSCITY SOFTWARE
  • US9846908B2 patent drawing
  • US9846908B2 patent drawing
  • US9846908B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for determining and presenting likely option strategies based on inputs is disclosed. An assets input is accepted where the asset input indicates an underlying asset for which options are available. Additional inputs may be accepted to further narrow the list of possible strategies. The system may attempt to predict and display the most likely option strategies based on the inputs.