Optional Re-routing for Navigation Deviation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional routing techniques in map navigation tools are inflexible and do not provide users with options for re-routing when they deviate from the predetermined route, failing to adapt to changes in the user's location during navigation.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that determines if a computing device is off a predetermined route and offers a re-route option, which can be selected via touch input on a touchscreen display, allowing users to recalculate a new route and automatically removing the option when the device returns to the original route.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional routing techniques are used to provide predetermined routes, then route guidance is simple and straightforward, but the system lacks flexibility when users deviate from the route

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The routing system dynamically adapts between predetermined routing mode and optional re-routing mode based on user deviation detection. The system transitions from a static predetermined route to a dynamic state where re-route options are offered, allowing the system to adjust its behavior based on real-time location data and user actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the routing parameter from strict adherence to a predetermined route to offering optional re-routing when deviation is detected. This parameter change allows the system to maintain simplicity for compliant users while providing flexibility for those who deviate, resolving the contradiction between route flexibility and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the system continuously monitors location to detect route deviation, then route accuracy is maintained, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation monitoring accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs location monitoring at a sufficient level to detect route deviation without continuous excessive checking. The monitoring is calibrated to trigger re-route options only when actual deviation occurs, rather than constantly updating and alerting, thus achieving adequate measurement precision while reducing unnecessary energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If re-route options are always displayed to users, then user control over routing is maximized, but user interface clutter increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The re-route option display is applied locally and conditionally - it appears only in the specific situation when a user deviates from the predetermined route. This localized application of the re-route option provides user control when needed without creating constant interface clutter, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and interface complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Speed

If the system provides immediate re-routing when deviation is detected, then navigation responsiveness is improved, but unnecessary direction updates occur when users return to the original route

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation responsivenessVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from continuous location monitoring to determine whether to provide re-routing. When deviation is detected, re-route options are offered; when the user returns to the original route, the system detects this and removes the re-route options. This feedback mechanism ensures responsive navigation only when necessary, avoiding unnecessary computational waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9163951B2Optional re-routing
Publication Date: 2015.10.20 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US9163951B2 patent drawing
  • US9163951B2 patent drawing
  • US9163951B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are tools and techniques for providing optional re-routing. In one exemplary embodiment disclosed herein, a determination is made that a location of a computing device is not on a predetermined route between a start location and an end location. Based on the determining, a re-route option is provided. Also, while the re-route option is available, a determination is made that a subsequent location of the computing device is on the predetermined route, or a re-route is performed responsive to receiving a touch-anywhere input event on a touchscreen display.