Optokinetic Response Spoof Detection for Biometric Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Biometric authentication systems face challenges in distinguishing between live persons and alternative representations, such as video recordings, leading to potential security breaches and reliability issues.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a video analysis engine to capture and analyze ocular data responses to a stimulus, comparing them to reference patterns to determine if the subject is a live person, thereby preventing access to secure systems if an alternative representation is detected.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional biometric authentication is used, then authentication speed is fast, but security against spoofing attacks is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against spoofingVSAvoidauthentication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary liveness detection by analyzing ocular responses to visual stimuli before completing the authentication process. This preliminary action identifies spoofed inputs early, preventing further processing of fraudulent authentication attempts and maintaining security without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary liveness detection layer that mediates between the video capture device and the biometric authentication engine. This intermediary analyzes ocular data and stimulus responses to determine whether the subject is alive, acting as a gatekeeper that blocks spoofed inputs from reaching the authentication engine.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If advanced spoof detection methods are implemented, then security is improved, but hardware costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespoof detection accuracyVSAvoidhardware cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses existing video capture infrastructure to capture ocular responses, copying the same video feed already being used for biometric authentication. This avoids the need for separate specialized hardware while enabling sophisticated liveness detection through software-based stimulus presentation and response analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the existing video capture device serve multiple functions: it captures both the biometric data needed for authentication and the ocular responses needed for liveness detection. The stimulus is presented through the existing display, and the same camera records both the face for authentication and the eye movements for spoof detection, eliminating the need for dedicated hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If ocular response analysis is added, then liveness detection is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliveness detectionVSAvoidauthentication processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously captures video feed during the authentication process, so ocular response data is already being collected while the user is naturally interacting with the stimulus. This continuous capture eliminates the need for separate measurement phases, allowing liveness detection to occur in parallel with authentication processing rather than sequentially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system analyzes only specific ocular parameters (such as pupil response, saccadic movements, or fixation patterns) rather than processing the entire video feed. This selective analysis of relevant ocular features reduces computational burden while maintaining effective liveness detection, preventing excessive processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the security and reliability of biometric authentication by effectively differentiating between live individuals and video recordings, adding an additional layer of security without requiring significant hardware upgrades, thus reducing costs and improving user experience.

Implementation Method 1

A determination is made, by comparing the ocular data to one or more reference patterns, that the subject in the captured video is an alternative representation of a live person

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptokinetic response:

Data Source

PatentUS10599934B1Spoof detection using optokinetic response
Publication Date: 2020.03.24 JUMIO CORP
  • US10599934B1 patent drawing
  • US10599934B1 patent drawing
  • US10599934B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The technology described in this document can be embodied in a method for preventing access to a secure system based on determining a captured video to be an alternative representation of a live person. The method includes presenting a stimulus on a user interface of a device. Video of a subject who is within a field of view of a video capture device is captured after presentation of the stimulus. The captured video is analyzed to extract ocular data comprising a response of the subject to the stimulus. A determination is made, by comparing the ocular data to one or more reference patterns that the subject in the captured video is an alternative representation of a live person. Responsive to determining that the subject in the captured video is an alternative representation of a live person, access to the secured system is prevented.