Optomechanical Inertial Sensor Reducing Electrostatic Noise

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

MEMS inertial sensors face issues with excessive noise and drift due to fabrication imperfections and electrostatic forces, which reduce their accuracy and sensitivity.

Innovation Solution

The development of a hybrid optical-electro-mechanical inertial sensor that combines cavity-enhanced optomechanical readout mechanisms with electrostatic actuation, allowing for large test masses to be used effectively, thereby increasing sensitivity and reducing noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If electrostatic force is used to regulate test mass motion, then noise and drift from fabrication imperfections are reduced, but parasitic capacitance and stray capacitance introduce additional noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor accuracyVSAvoidelectrostatic noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the harmful electrostatic actuation from the sensing process by using optical fields for both actuation and readout. The test mass is actuated by optical radiation pressure and read out by optomechanical coupling, completely removing electrodes and parasitic capacitances from the system. This extraction of the harmful electrostatic component while retaining the useful test mass regulation function resolves the contradiction between reduced fabrication noise and increased electrostatic noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If capacitive readout is used to detect test mass displacement, then inertial force measurement is enabled, but readout interference with electrostatic actuation increases noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplacement detection accuracyVSAvoidreadout interference noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the electrostatic capacitive readout system with an optomechanical readout system. Instead of using electrodes to detect test mass displacement through capacitance changes, the invention uses optical fields that couple to the mechanical motion of the test mass. This substitution of the readout mechanism eliminates the interference between readout and actuation fields, as optical and mechanical fields do not interact parasitically like electrostatic fields do.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If purely optical inertial sensors are used, then electrostatic noise is eliminated, but fabrication complexity and device size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrostatic noiseVSAvoidfabrication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the optical field multi-functional by using it for both actuation and readout purposes. The same optical system that drives the test mass motion also detects the displacement through optomechanical coupling. This universality eliminates the need for separate electrostatic actuation and capacitive readout systems, thereby reducing fabrication complexity and device size while maintaining the noise benefits of optical sensing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in improved sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio, enabling precise control of test mass movement and reducing positioning errors, leading to highly stable and accurate inertial measurements.

Implementation Method 1

one or more microresonators, each microresonator supporting a corresponding optical resonance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical resonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

one or more electrodes for counteracting a deflection of the test mass with an electrostatic force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 3

one or more optical couplers for coupling light into and out of a corresponding microresonator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical coupling: Optical Fibre

Implementation Method 4

one or more detectors for detecting light received from the one or more microresonators by the one or more optical couplers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20240085450A1Inertial sensor and inertial measurement unit
Publication Date: 2024.03.14 ZERO POINT MOTION LTD
  • US20240085450A1 patent drawing
  • US20240085450A1 patent drawing
  • US20240085450A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Inertial Sensors and Inertial Measurement Units are provided. In one example, the inertial sensor comprises one or more microresonators, each microresonator supporting a corresponding optical resonance. The inertial sensor further comprises a micro-electro-mechanical inertial test mass suspended adjacent to and non-contiguous with the one or more microresonators, the test mass deflectable under the application of an inertial force. The inertial sensor further comprises one or more electrodes for counteracting a deflection of the test mass with an electrostatic force. The inertial sensor further comprises one or more optical couplers for coupling light into and out of a corresponding microresonator. The inertial sensor further comprises one or more detectors for detecting light received from the one or more microresonators by the one or more optical couplers. A change in a spacing between the test mass and at least one microresonator causes a change in the optical resonance characteristics of that microresonator.