Optomechanical Noise Rejection via Dual-Frequency Modulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optomechanical devices face limitations in noise rejection due to fluctuations in amplitude and frequency, which affect the mechanical resonance frequency and are read as acceleration noise, limiting their performance.

Innovation Solution

A circuit is configured to modulate an optical signal into two frequency components symmetrically detuned relative to the optical resonance, allowing for spectral separation and stabilization, thereby mitigating amplitude and frequency noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single optical frequency is used to read out the mechanical resonance, then the measurement process is simple, but amplitude and frequency fluctuations cause noise that limits performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise rejectionVSAvoidoptical signal processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optical signal is segmented into two distinct frequency components (first and second optical frequency components) that are detuned symmetrically from the mechanical resonance frequency. This segmentation allows the system to probe the mechanical resonance from multiple frequency perspectives simultaneously, enabling noise rejection through differential measurement while maintaining a relatively simple overall device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the optical frequency parameter by detuning the first and second optical frequency components from the mechanical resonance frequency by equal but opposite amounts (±Δ). This parameter change allows the system to measure the mechanical resonance response at multiple frequency offsets, and by comparing these responses, amplitude and frequency fluctuations can be rejected while extracting the true acceleration signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If optical frequency is detuned from mechanical resonance, then amplitude noise is rejected, but the coupling strength between optical and mechanical systems decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamplitude noise rejectionVSAvoidoptical-mechanical coupling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

While the detuning amounts are symmetric (±Δ), the system exploits the asymmetric response of the mechanical resonance to optical driving at different frequency offsets. By measuring the differential response of the mechanical system to the two detuned optical frequencies, the system can reject common-mode amplitude noise while maintaining sufficient coupling strength through optimized detuning selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a copy of the mechanical resonance measurement process at a detuned optical frequency. By comparing the original resonance measurement with the detuned copy, the system can distinguish between true mechanical displacement (caused by acceleration) and spurious amplitude fluctuations, thereby rejecting noise while maintaining measurement sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the performance of optomechanical devices by reducing noise interference, enabling accurate measurement of high acceleration values and improving sensitivity for detecting small changes in acceleration, velocity, and vibration.

Implementation Method 1

A circuit of an optomechanical device may be configured to modulate an optical signal into a first optical frequency component corresponding to the optical resonance plus one quarter of the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of the optical resonance, and a second optical frequency component corresponding to the optical resonance minus one quarter of the FWHM of the optical resonance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical modulation: Phase Modulation

Implementation Method 2

The mechanical resonance frequency can be read out with an optical field by applying near-resonant light to the structure's optical resonance and measuring the transmitted or reflected optical signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical resonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 3

fluctuations (e.g., small fluctuations) in amplitude or frequency that shift a mechanical resonance frequency (e.g., via the optical spring effect)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical spring effect:

Implementation Method 4

the circuit may generate a tuning signal for driving a light-emitting module using a difference between a Direct Current (DC) intensity level of the first optical frequency component in the modulated optical signal and a DC intensity level of the second optical frequency component in the modulated optical signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP3730948B1Noise rejection for optomechanical devices
Publication Date: 2022.09.21 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP3730948B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3730948B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3730948B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An optomechanical device comprising a circuit configured to generate an optical signal using a tuning signal and modulate the optical signal at a frequency corresponding to one quarter of a Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of an optical resonance of the proof mass assembly to generate a partially modulated optical signal. The circuit being further configured to filter the partially modulated optical signal to remove a central carrier from the partially modulated optical signal to generate a filtered optical signal, modulate the filtered optical signal to generate a modulated optical signal driven to the mechanical resonance of the proof mass assembly, and generate the tuning signal using a difference between a DC intensity level of a first optical frequency component in the modulated optical signal and a DC intensity level of a second optical frequency component in the modulated optical signal.