Oral Arsenic Trioxide Composition Dissolution Process

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for preparing oral arsenic trioxide compositions are costly, complex, and inefficient, with low solubility in water and no USFDA-approved oral formulations available, necessitating a more economical and industrially feasible process with improved dissolution profiles.

Innovation Solution

Development of an oral pharmaceutical composition of arsenic trioxide in the form of capsules, tablets, or granules using pharmaceutically acceptable excipients like diluents, binders, lubricants, and surfactants, prepared through wet granulation, spray drying, or rotary evaporator processes, ensuring at least 80% arsenic trioxide release within 45 minutes without lyophilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If lyophilization is used to prepare oral arsenic trioxide composition, then dissolution profile is improved, but manufacturing cost increases and process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedissolution profileVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the lyophilization step from the manufacturing process, replacing it with a simpler formulation approach that achieves comparable dissolution profiles without the complex equipment and processes required for freeze-drying

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the formulation parameters by incorporating specific excipients and adjusting the physical-chemical properties of the oral composition, thereby achieving improved dissolution without requiring lyophilization processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If arsenic trioxide is administered orally, then QT interval prolongation and ventricular tachycardia are reduced, but peak plasma concentration is lower

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQT interval prolongationVSAvoidpeak plasma concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention modifies the formulation parameters including pH-adjusting agents and surfactants to optimize the dissolution and absorption characteristics of arsenic trioxide, achieving a balance between reduced cardiotoxicity and adequate plasma concentration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite oral formulation combining arsenic trioxide with multiple excipients including pH-adjusting agents, surfactants, and other pharmaceutically acceptable materials to enhance bioavailability while reducing harmful effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Quantity of substance

If arsenic trioxide is administered intravenously, then peak plasma concentration is higher, but QT interval prolongation and ventricular tachycardia increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak plasma concentrationVSAvoidventricular tachycardia
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces an oral formulation as an intermediary route of administration that mediates between the high peak concentration of IV administration and the reduced efficacy of simple oral dosing, achieving therapeutic效果 with reduced cardiotoxicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the administration route and formulation parameters to achieve a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile with reduced peak plasma concentrations and associated cardiotoxic effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional processes are used to prepare oral arsenic trioxide, then manufacturing is simpler, but dissolution profile is poor and cost-effectiveness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoiddissolution profile
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes formulation parameters including the use of pH-adjusting agents, surfactants, and specific excipients to achieve improved dissolution profiles through conventional manufacturing processes without requiring complex equipment or procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The new process provides a cost-effective, efficient, and industrially viable oral arsenic trioxide composition with enhanced dissolution profiles, meeting regulatory standards and effectively treating acute promyelocytic leukemia and other cancers.

Implementation Method 1

The oral composition can be prepared by wet granulation process (such as fluid bed processor or rapid mixer granulator)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWet granulation:

Implementation Method 2

The oral composition can be prepared by spray drying process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

The oral composition can be prepared by rotary evaporator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS20240139108A1Oral pharmaceutical composition of arsenic trioxide
Publication Date: 2024.05.02 INTAS PHARM LTD
  • US20240139108A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides oral pharmaceutical composition comprising Arsenic trioxide and one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients for use in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia and other cancers like acute myeloid leukemia. Further, the present invention provides a process for the preparation of the said composition.